Cited by 23Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management

THE RISK OF MOTHERS LOSING AN ONLY CHILD IN CHINA

Open access
JIANG, QUANBAO, LI, YING, SÁNCHEZ-BARRICARTE, JESÚS J.·2014·Journal of Biosocial Science

Abstract

China's one-child policy has been quite successful in bringing down the country's fertility level but has produced a large number of one-child families. The risk of one-child families losing their only child has not received enough attention. In this paper, using an extension of Goldman & Lord (1983)'s method to measure widowhood, period life-table data from China's 2000 population census are used to examine age-specific and cumulative probabilities of mothers losing their only child. It is found that a mother faces a 14.94% probability of losing a son, and 12.21% probability of losing a daughter. As the age of first-time mothers increases, the probability of losing a child declines. Urban and rural mothers have different indices regarding the loss of children. Based on these findings the prospects for China's one-child policy are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021932013000540

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is estimated that a million Chinese families have already lost their only children.

    “It is estimated that a million Chinese families have already lost their only children ( Jiang et al. 2014, Song 2014), and the risk of losing an only child in rural areas is 1.68 times that in urban areas (Wang 2013(Wang , 2016)).”

    From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Jiang et al. 2014

    The Introduction describes Chinese parents who had already lost an only child, but it does not estimate how many families had experienced that loss. Searches for “one million,” “million families,” and an estimated number of bereaved families found no support for the claimed figure. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Banister J Hill K 2004 Mortality in China 1964–2000 Population Studies 58 1 55 75 15204262
  2. Bongaarts J Greenhalgh S 1985 An alternative to the one child policy in China Population and Development Review 11 4 585 617
  3. Cai Y 2010 China’s below-replacement fertility: Government policy or socioeconomic development Population and Development Review 36 3 419 440 20882701
  4. Choe M Hao H Wang F 1995 Effects of gender, birth order, and other correlates on childhood mortality in China Social Biology 42 1–2 50 64 7481920
  5. Coale AJ Demeny P 1966 Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations Princeton University Press
  6. Falbo T Poston DL 1993 The academic, personality, and physical outcomes of only children in China Child Development 64 18 35 8436028
  7. Fenwick R Barresi CM 1981 Health consequences of marital-status change among the elderly: A comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses Journal of Health and Social Behavior 22 2 106 116 7240710
  8. Goldman N Lord G 1983 Sex differences in life cycle measures of widowhood Demography 20 2 177 195 6862061
  9. Greenhalgh S Bongaarts J 1987 Fertility policy in China: Future options Science 235 4793 1167 1172 3823877
  10. Gu B Wang F Guo Z Zhang E 2007 China's local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century Population and Development Review 33 1 129 147
  11. Hill K Upchurch DM 1995 Gender differences in child health: Evidence from the demographic and health surveys Population and Development Review 21 1 127 151
  12. Huang R 2009 China’s only children: Number, structure and risk Journal of Nanjing College for Population Program Management 25 1 5 10 (In Chinese)
  13. Keyfitz N Caswell H 2005 Applied Mathematical Demography Springer Science + Business Media, Inc
  14. Lavely W 2001 First impressions from the 2000 census of China Population and Development Review 27 4 755 769
  15. Li S Sun F 2003 Mortality analysis of China’s 2000 population census data: A preliminary examination The China Review 3 2 31 48
  16. Li S Zhu C Feldman MW 2004 Gender differences in child survival in contemporary rural China: A county study Journal of Biosocial Science 36 1 83 109 14989533
  17. Li S Sun F Jiang Q 2005 Death reports from China’s 2000 census Population in a Transformational Period: National Key Project of Population Census in 2000 Beijing China Statistics Press (In Chinese)
  18. Jiang Q Li X Sánchez-Barricarte Jesús J 2012 Elderly widowhood in rapidly ageing China Paper presented at the international conference of Advances in Methodology and Applications: Bio-demography and Multistate Event History Analysis on Healthy Aging October 15–18, 2012 Beijing and Hangzhou in China
  19. Morgan PS Guo Z Hayford SR 2009 China’s below-replacement fertility: Recent trends and future prospects Population and Development Review 35 3 605 629 20376285 PMC2849170
  20. Myers RJ 1959 Statistical measures in the marital life cycles of men and women International Population Conference, 1959 Vienna Christopher Reisser’s Sons 229 233
  21. Pan J Jiang J 2007 The numerical estimate of only children and analysis of their risk Journal of Yangzhou University 11 1 103 108 (In Chinese)
  22. Peng X 2011 China’s demographic history and future challenges Scinece 333 581 587 21798939
  23. Poston DL Falbo T 1990 Academic performance and personality traits of Chinese children: 'Onlies' versus others American Journal of Sociology 96 2 433 451
  24. Walfish D 2001 China’s census: National count reveals major societal changes Science 292 5523 1823 11397927
  25. Zeng Y 2007 Options for fertility policy transition in China Population and Development Review 33 2 215 246
  26. Zhang X Kanbur R 2005 Spatial inequality in education and health care in China China Economic Review 16 2 189 204

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JIANG, Q., LI, Y., & SÁNCHEZ-BARRICARTE, J. J.
Affiliations
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Biosocial Science
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
531-545
ISSN
  • 0021-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7599
OpenAlex
W2111560605
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biosocial Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG017253)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Keywords
one-child policy, child mortality, widowhood, period life tables, urban-rural differences, fertility decline, China
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, China, Female, Humans, Mothers, Only Child, Probability, Risk, Rural Population, Urban Population, Family Planning Policy, Child Mortality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review