The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women's education and utilization of maternal health services in Africa: a multi‐country and socioeconomic status analysis
Abstract
Summary: There is an abundant literature on the relationship between women’s education and maternal and child outcomes, including antenatal and postnatal care, onset of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance. However, few studies have adopted the ‘equity’ lens, despite increasing evidence that inequities between rich and poor are increasing although maternal and child mortality is declining. This study examined the differential effects of women’s education within different socioeconomic strata in Africa. The most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ghana, Nigeria and Zimbabwe were used. In each country, the original sample was stratified into three socioeconomic groups: poor, middle and rich. For each maternal health service utilization variable, the gross and net effects of women’s education, controlling for age, parity, religion, marital status, health insurance, access to health facilities, partner’s education and current place of residence, were estimated using logistic regression, taking into account the complex sampling design of the DHS. The findings revealed country-specific variations in maternal health service utilization, and for most indicators there was a clear gradient among socioeconomic strata: women living in better-off households exhibited greater access to, and utilization of, maternal health services. Multivariate analyses revealed that women’s education had a positive association with type of antenatal care provider, timing and frequency of antenatal care visits, place of delivery and presence of a skilled birth attendant at delivery. Many other factors were found to be significantly associated with maternal health service utilization. For instance, parity had a negative and significant association with timing of first antenatal care visit. Likewise, partner’s education was positively and statistically associated with timing of first antenatal care visit. It is argued that an over-generalization of the association between women’s education and maternal health service utilization can be misleading. Efforts to improve maternal health service utilization in Africa must adopt an ‘equity’ approach, taking into account the specific needs of sub-populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Women's education has long been associated with improved maternal and child health outcomes, including greater healthcare utilization, enhanced decision‐making autonomy, and improved economic resilience.”
From Effects of maternal education on maternal and perinatal outcomes: An individual participant data meta‐analysis of 2 356 402 pregnancies (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion
Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) · doi:10.17226/10883 · Cited by 3,444
Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context
Thaddeus, S., & Maine, D. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7 · Cited by 3,240
Simkhada, B., Teijlingen, E. R. V., Porter, M., & Simkhada, P. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04532.x · Cited by 977
Babalola, S., & Fatusi, A. (2009) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-43 · Cited by 840
Moyer, C. A., Adongo, P. B., Aborigo, R. A., Hodgson, A., Engmann, C. M., & DeVries, R. (2014) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-013-1240-y · Cited by 111
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- 10.2471/BLT.06.035659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2393-9-34 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0021932011000472 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0021932012000041 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-698X-13-20 · DOI
- 10.1186/1478-4491-7-7 · DOI
- 2003, Antenatal Care in Developing Countries: Promises, Achievements and Missed Opportunities. An Analysis of Trends, Levels and Differentials, 1990–2001
- 10.1186/1472-698X-6-7 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0011190 · DOI · Paper page
- Dalal, 2012, Economic empowerment of women and utilization of maternal delivery care in Bangladesh, International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 3, 628
- 10.1186/1742-4755-6-9 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2009-1162B · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60559-0 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12939-015-0162-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50052-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.047 · DOI
- Boerma, 2008, Mind the gap: equity and trends in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in 54 Countdown countries, Lancet, 371, 1259, 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60560-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69382-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11205-004-5579-8 · DOI
- 10.2471/BLT.12.112425 · DOI
- 10.1155/2015/971506 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10995-013-1266-1 · DOI
- 10.3386/w0539 · DOI
- 10.1057/eej.2008.13 · DOI
- Ganle, 2015, Socio-cultural barriers to accessibility and utilization of maternal and newborn healthcare services in Ghana after user-fee abolition, Internal Journal of Maternal and Child Health, 3, 1
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0051904 · DOI
- 2011, Evaluating the Quality of Care for Severe Pregnancy Complications: The WHO Near-Miss Approach for Maternal Health
- 10.1186/s12939-014-0089-z · DOI
- 10.1186/1756-0500-7-723 · DOI
- 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181b0eeff · DOI
- 10.3402/gha.v6i0.19652 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000294 · DOI
- 10.1093/heapol/czh009 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000295 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01111.x · DOI
- 2015, Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015
- 10.2307/2173888 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10995-008-0326-4 · DOI
- 2009, State of the World’s Children 2010
- 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61429-8 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2393-11-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.whi.2012.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2393-12-4 · DOI
- 10.1093/heapol/czu090 · DOI
- Wolter, 2003, Introduction to Variance Estimation
- 10.1097/00002030-200205030-00019 · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90201-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00411-4 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0031666 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04722-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.11564/25-1-264 · DOI
- 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259 · DOI
- Elo, 1992, Utilization of maternal health-care services in Peru: the role of women’s education, Health Transition Review, 2, 49
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60518-1 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Tessema, Z. T., Worku, M. G., Tesema, G. A., Alamneh, T. S., Teshale, A. B., Yeshaw, Y., Alem, A. Z., Ayalew, H. G., & Liyew, A. M. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054397 · Cited by 129
Rosário, E. V. N., Gomes, M. C., Brito, M., & Costa, D. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221280 · Cited by 59
Bello‐Álvarez, L., Fernández‐Félix, B. M., Allotey, J., Thangaratinam, S., & Zamora, J. (2026) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.70401 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsala Dimbuene, Z., Amo-Adjei, J., Amugsi, D., Mumah, J., Izugbara, C. O., & Beguy, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biosocial Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-11-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 725-748
- ISSN
- 0021-9320
- 1469-7599
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.