Cited by 153Historical Economic and Social StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Old Questions, New Data, and Alternative Perspectives: Families' Living Standards in the Industrial Revolution

Horrell, Sara, Humphries, Jane·1992·The Journal of Economic History

Abstract

We have used the household accounts of 1,350 husband-wife families to investigate trends in male earnings and family incomes. This evidence confirms the material progress suggested by trends in the real wage rates of adult males. But the budget data underscore occupational and regional distinctions, discontinuities in the growth process, and changes over time in the ability of other family members to offset the effects of the business cycle on men's earnings. Overall, family incomes grew less than male earnings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022050700011931

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the real wages/earnings of employed manual workers were about the same in 1830 and 1840, then their annual income must have declined, on average, during this period.

    “If the real wages/earnings of employed manual workers were about the same in 1830 and 1840, as the estimates of Feinstein and Horrell and Humphries suggest, then their annual income must have declined, on average, during this period.”

    From The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto (1998) · cites this paper as Horrell and Humphries, 1992

  • The real wage series in Table 1 show that real wages/earnings of manual workers and their families increased significantly from around 1820 to 1851.

    “The series in the first three columns all show that real wages/earnings of manual workers and their families increased significantly from around 1820 to 1851, although the series reported by Lindert and Williamson (1983) and Horrell and Humphries (1992) are more “optimistic” than the series reported by Feinstein (1995).”

    From The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto (1998) · cites this paper as Horrell and Humphries, 1992

  • Real wages of manual workers increased substantially in the first half of the 1830s, but then fell back in the second half, so that wages around 1840 were nearly identical to those in 1830.

    “Feinstein (1995) and Horrell and Humphries (1992) both find that real wages of manual workers increased substantially in the first half of the 1830s, but then fell back in the second half, so that wages around 1840 were nearly identical to those in 1830, as shown in the second and third columns of Table 1.”

    From The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto (1998) · cites this paper as Horrell and Humphries, 1992

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. McKendrick, 1974, Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honour of J. H. Plumb, 152
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511561207 · DOI
  3. Bowley, 1898, The Statistics of Wages in the United Kingdom During the Last Hundred Years: I. Agricultural Wages, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 61, 702
  4. Lindert P. , “English Occupations, 1670–1811,” this Journal, 40 (12 1980), pp. 685–712. · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S001041750001536X · DOI
  6. Lee, 1979, British Regional Employment Statistics, 1814–1971
  7. 10.2307/2956584 · DOI
  8. Hunt, 1981, British Labour History 1815–1914
  9. 10.1017/CBO9780511522659 · DOI
  10. Benson, 1980, British Coalminers in the Nineteenth Century: A Social History
  11. Anderson, 1971, Family Structure in Nineteenth Century Lancashire
  12. 10.1111/j.1468-229X.1974.tb02221.x · DOI
  13. Williamson, 1985, Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality?
  14. Pollard S. , “Sheffield and Sweet Auburn: Amenities and Living Standards in the British Industrial Revolution,” this Journal, 41 (1981), pp. 902–4.
  15. Crafts, 1985, British Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution
  16. Horrell S. , and Humphries J. , “‘Neither Welcome nor Understood’: The Transition to the Male Breadwinner Family in British Industrialization” (Photocopy, Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge, 1992).
  17. Horrell S. , and Humphries J. , “Male Earnings Estimates from Household Accounts” (Photocopy, Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge, 1992).
  18. Horrell S. , and Humphries J. , “Demographic Characteristics of Husband-Wife Households” (Photocopy, Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge, 1992).
  19. 10.1093/past/126.1.115 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/S0010417500015826 · DOI
  21. Anderson, 1980, Approaches to the History of the Western Family
  22. Bowley, 1899, The Statistics of Wages in the United Kingdom in the Last Hundred Years: IV. Agricultural Wages—Concluded. Earnings and General Averages, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 555
  23. Bowley, 1902, The Statistics of Wages in the United Kingdom in the Last Hundred Years: IX. Wages in the Worsted and Woollen Trades of the West Riding of Yorkshire, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 102
  24. Bowley, 1899, The Statistics of Wages in the United Kingdom in the Last Hundred Years: V. Printers, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 708
  25. 10.1017/CBO9780511528590 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Brown J. C. , “The Condition of England and the Standard of Living: Cotton Textiles in the Northwest, 1806–1850,” this Journal, 50 (09 1990), pp. 591–614. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Burnett, 1979, Plenty and Want: A Social History of Diet in England from 1815 to the Present Day
  28. Crafts N. F. R. , “English Workers' Real Wages During the Industrial Revolution: Some Remaining Problems,” this Journal, 45 (03 1985), pp. 139–44. · DOI
  29. Deane, 1962, British Economic Growth, 1688–1959
  30. Flinn, 1984, The History of the British Coal Industry: Vol. 2, 1700–1830
  31. Church, 1986, The History of the British Coal Industry: Vol. 3, 1830–1913
  32. 10.1017/CBO9780511983245 · DOI
  33. 10.4324/9780203222379 · DOI
  34. Phelps, 1959, The Growth of British Industrial Relations
  35. Hunt, 1987, Wages in Britain During the Industrial Revolution, Economic History Review, 40, 380, 10.2307/2596251 · DOI
  36. Levine, 1977, Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism
  37. Lindert, 1983, English Workers' Living Standards During the Industrial Revolution: A New Look, Economic History Review, 36, 1
  38. Lindert P. , and Williamson J. G. , “English Workers' Real Wages: A Reply to Crafts,” this Journal, 45 (03 1985), pp. 145–53. · DOI
  39. Mathias, 1983, The First Industrial Nation: An Economic History of Britain 1700–1914
  40. Mitchell, 1962, Abstract of British Historical Statistics
  41. Neale, 1985, Writing Marxist History
  42. 10.2307/2340415 · DOI
  43. Humphries, 1991, ‘Lurking in the wings …’: Women in the Historiography of the Industrial Revolution, Business and Economic History, 20, 32
  44. Phelps, 1955, Seven Centuries of Building Wages, Economica, 22, 195, 10.2307/2626898 · DOI
  45. Moykr J. , “Is There Still Life in the Pessimist Case? Consumption During the Industrial Revolution 1790–1850,” this Journal, 48 (03 1988), pp. 69–92. · DOI
  46. Lyons, 1989, Family Response to Economic Decline: Handloom Weavers in Early Nineteenth-Century Lancashire, Research in Economic History, 12, 45
  47. 10.2307/2340154 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Horrell, S., & Humphries, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Economic History
Published
1992-12
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
849-880
ISSN
  • 0022-0507 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6372
OpenAlex
W2109639206
Cited by
153
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Economic History (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
living standards, Industrial Revolution, household accounts, household income, male earnings, real wages, business cycles, occupational differences, regional variation, material progress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review