The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes
Abstract
We analyse the currently popular vortex identification criteria that are based on point-wise analysis of the velocity gradient tensor. A new measure of spiralling compactness of material orbits in vortices is introduced and using this measure a new local vortex identification criterion and requirements for a vortex core are proposed. The inter-relationships between the different criteria are explored analytically and in a few flow examples, using both zero and non-zero thresholds for the identification parameter. These inter-relationships provide a new interpretation of the various criteria in terms of the local flow kinematics. A canonical turbulent flow example is studied, and it is observed that all the criteria, given the proposed usage of threshold, result in remarkably similar looking vortical structures. A unified interpretation based on local flow kinematics is offered for when similarity or differences can be expected in the vortical structures educed using the different criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, J.-X., Wu, J.-L., & Xiao, H. (2017) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603 · Cited by 737
WU, X., & MOIN, P. (2009) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112009006624 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- CHAKRABORTY, P., BALACHANDAR, S., & ADRIAN, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-05
- Volume
- 535
- Pages
- 189-214
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W1981799239
- Cited by
- 923
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112005004726
- The paper
- CHAKRABORTY, P., BALACHANDAR, S., & ADRIAN, R. J. (2005). On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112005004726
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.