Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow

WU, XIAOHUA, MOIN, PARVIZ·2008·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

Fully developed incompressible turbulent pipe flow at bulk-velocity- and pipe-diameter-based Reynolds number ReD=44000 was simulated with second-order finite-difference methods on 630 million grid points. The corresponding Kármán number R+, based on pipe radius R, is 1142, and the computational domain length is 15 R. The computed mean flow statistics agree well with Princeton Superpipe data at ReD=41727 and at ReD=74000. Second-order turbulence statistics show good agreement with experimental data at ReD=38000. Near the wall the gradient of $\mbox{ln}\overline{u}_{z}^{+}$ with respect to ln(1−r)+ varies with radius except for a narrow region, 70 < (1−r)+ < 120, within which the gradient is approximately 0.149. The gradient of $\overline{u}_{z}^{+}$ with respect to ln{(1−r)++a+} at the present relatively low Reynolds number of ReD=44000 is not consistent with the proposition that the mean axial velocity $\overline{u}_{z}^{+}$ is logarithmic with respect to the sum of the wall distance (1−r)+ and an additive constant a+ within a mesolayer below 300 wall units. For the standard case of a+=0 within the narrow region from (1−r)+=50 to 90, the gradient of $\overline{u}_{z}^{+}$ with respect to ln{(1−r)++a+} is approximately 2.35. Computational results at the lower Reynolds number ReD=5300 also agree well with existing data. The gradient of $\overline{u}_{z}$ with respect to 1−r at ReD=44000 is approximately equal to that at ReD=5300 for the region of 1−r > 0.4. For 5300 < ReD < 44000, bulk-velocity-normalized mean velocity defect profiles from the present DNS and from previous experiments collapse within the same radial range of 1−r > 0.4. A rationale based on the curvature of mean velocity gradient profile is proposed to understand the perplexing existence of logarithmic mean velocity profile in very-low-Reynolds-number pipe flows. Beyond ReD=44000, axial turbulence intensity varies linearly with radius within the range of 0.15 < 1−r < 0.7. Flow visualizations and two-point correlations reveal large-scale structures with comparable near-wall azimuthal dimensions at ReD=44000 and 5300 when measured in wall units. When normalized in outer units, streamwise coherence and azimuthal dimension of the large-scale structures in the pipe core away from the wall are also comparable at these two Reynolds numbers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022112008002085

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 421

Metadata

Authors
WU, X., & MOIN, P.
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2008-07-11
Volume
608
Pages
81-112
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W2168479071
Cited by
421
References
0
FWCI
21.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112008002085
The paper
WU, X., & MOIN, P. (2008). A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112008002085

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.