Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct simulation of particle dispersion in a decaying isotropic turbulence

Elghobashi, S., Truesdell, G. C.·1992·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

Dispersion of solid particles in decaying isotropic turbulence is studied numerically. The three-dimensional, time-dependent velocity field of a homogeneous, non-stationary turbulence was computed using the method of direct numerical simulation (DNS). A numerical grid containing 96 3 points was sufficient to resolve the turbulent motion at the Kolmogorov lengthscale for a range of microscale Reynolds numbers starting from Rλ= 25 and decaying to Rλ= 16. The dispersion characteristics of three different solid particles (corn, copper and glass) injected in the flow, were obtained by integrating the complete equation of particle motion along the instantaneous trajectories of 22 3 particles for each particle type, and then performing ensemble averaging. The three different particles are those used by Snyder & Lumley (1971), referred to throughout the paper as SL, in their pioneering wind-tunnel experiment. Good agreement was achieved between our DNS results and the measured time development of the mean-square displacement of the particles. The simulation results also include the time development of the mean-square relative velocity of the particles, the Lagrangian velocity autocorrelation and the turbulent diffusivity of the particles and fluid points. The Lagrangian velocity frequency spectra of the particles and their surrounding fluid, as well as the time development of all the forces acting on one particle are also presented. In order to distinguish between the effects of inertia and gravity on the dispersion statistics we compare the results of simulations made with and without the buoyancy force included in the particle motion equation. A summary of the significant results is provided in §7 of the paper. The main objective of the paper is to enhance the understanding of the physics of particle dispersion in a simple turbulent flow by examining the simulation results described above and answering the questions of how and why the dispersion statistics of a solid particle differ from those of its corresponding fluid point and surrounding fluid and what influences inertia and gravity have on these statistics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022112092002532

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Elghobashi, S., & Truesdell, G. C.
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
1992-09
Volume
242
Pages
655-700
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W2154570448
Cited by
441
References
20
FWCI
29.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct simulation of particle dispersion in a decaying isotropic turbulence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112092002532
The paper
Elghobashi, S., & Truesdell, G. C. (1992). Direct simulation of particle dispersion in a decaying isotropic turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112092002532

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.