The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment
Abstract
Direct numerical simulations (DNS) and experiments are carried out to study fully developed turbulent pipe flow at Reynolds number Rec≈ 7000 based on centreline velocity and pipe diameter. The agreement between numerical and experimental results is excellent for the lower-order statistics (mean flow and turbulence intensities) and reasonably good for the higher-order statistics (skewness and flatness factors). To investigate the differences between fully developed turbulent flow in an axisymmetric pipe and a plane channel geometry, the present DNS results are compared to those obtained from a channel flow simulation. Beside the mean flow properties and turbulence statistics up to fourth order, the energy budgets of the Reynolds-stress components are computed and compared. The present results show that the mean velocity profile in the pipe fails to conform to the accepted law of the wall, in contrast to the channel flow. This confirms earlier observations reported in the literature. The statistics on fluctuating velocities, including the energy budgets of the Reynolds stresses, appear to be less affected by the axisymmetric pipe geometry. Only the skewness factor of the normal-to-the-wall velocity fluctuations differs in the pipe flow compared to the channel flow. The energy budgets illustrate that the normal-to-the-wall velocity fluctuations in the pipe are altered owing to a different ‘impingement’ or ‘splatting’ mechanism close to the curved wall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number
Kim, J., Moin, P., & Moser, R. (1987) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112087000892 · Cited by 4,873
Cited by
Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor
Nicoud, F., & Ducros, F. (1999) · Flow, Turbulence and Combustion · doi:10.1023/a:1009995426001 · Cited by 4,161
Convective Heat and Mass Transfer
Ghiaasiaan, S. M. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511800603 · Cited by 788
Variations of von Kármán coefficient in canonical flows
Nagib, H. M., & Chauhan, K. A. (2008) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.3006423 · Cited by 395
Steady and Unsteady Flow Simulations Using the Hybrid Flow Solver AVBP
Schonfeld, T., & Rudgyard, M. (1999) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/2.636 · Cited by 393
Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow at Moderately High Reynolds Numbers
El Khoury, G. K., Schlatter, P., Noorani, A., Fischer, P. F., Brethouwer, G., & Johansson, A. V. (2013) · Flow, Turbulence and Combustion · doi:10.1007/s10494-013-9482-8 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Eggels, J. G. M., Unger, F., Weiss, M. H., Westerweel, J., Adrian, R. J., Friedrich, R., & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1994-06-10
- Volume
- 268
- Pages
- 175-210
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2017699595
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s002211209400131x
- The paper
- Eggels, J. G. M., Unger, F., Weiss, M. H., Westerweel, J., Adrian, R. J., Friedrich, R., & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. (1994). Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002211209400131x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.