The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the identification of a vortex
Abstract
Considerable confusion surrounds the longstanding question of what constitutes a vortex, especially in a turbulent flow. This question, frequently misunderstood as academic, has recently acquired particular significance since coherent structures (CS) in turbulent flows are now commonly regarded as vortices. An objective definition of a vortex should permit the use of vortex dynamics concepts to educe CS, to explain formation and evolutionary dynamics of CS, to explore the role of CS in turbulence phenomena, and to develop viable turbulence models and control strategies for turbulence phenomena. We propose a definition of a vortex in an incompressible flow in terms of the eigenvalues of the symmetric tensor ${\bm {\cal S}}^2 + {\bm \Omega}^2$; here ${\bm {\cal S}}$ and ${\bm \Omega}$ are respectively the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the velocity gradient tensor ${\bm \Delta}{\bm u}$. This definition captures the pressure minimum in a plane perpendicular to the vortex axis at high Reynolds numbers, and also accurately defines vortex cores at low Reynolds numbers, unlike a pressure-minimum criterion. We compare our definition with prior schemes/definitions using exact and numerical solutions of the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations for a variety of laminar and turbulent flows. In contrast to definitions based on the positive second invariant of ${\bm \Delta}{\bm u}$ or the complex eigenvalues of ${\bm \Delta}{\bm u}$, our definition accurately identifies the vortex core in flows where the vortex geometry is intuitively clear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of Experimental Work in Biomimetic Foils
Triantafyllou, M. S., Techet, A. H., & Hover, F. S. (2004) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2004.833216 · Cited by 448
Classifying vortex wakes using neural networks
Colvert, B., Alsalman, M., & Kanso, E. (2018) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3190/aaa787 · Cited by 95
Blanchard, A., Bergman, L. A., & Vakakis, A. F. (2020) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-019-04775-3 · Cited by 74
Inflow boundary conditions determine T-mixer efficiency
Schikarski, T., Trzenschiok, H., Peukert, W., & Avila, M. (2019) · Reaction Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1039/c8re00208h · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeong, J., & Hussain, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-02-25
- Volume
- 285
- Pages
- 69-94
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W1979176272
- Cited by
- 6,465
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the identification of a vortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112095000462
- The paper
- Jeong, J., & Hussain, F. (1995). On the identification of a vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112095000462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.