The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of ‘splashing’ in the collapse of a laser-generated cavity near a rigid boundary
Abstract
Vapour cavities in liquid flows have long been associated with cavitation damage to nearby solid surfaces and it is thought that the final stage of collapse, when a high- speed liquid jet threads the cavity, plays a vital role in this process. The present study investigates this aspect of the motion of laser-generated cavities in a quiescent liquid when the distance (or stand-off) of the point of inception from a rigid boundary is between 0.8 and 1.2 times the maximum radius of the cavity. Numerical simulations using a boundary integral method with an incompressible liquid impact model provide a framework for the interpretation of the experimental results. It is observed that, within the given interval of the stand-off parameter, the peak pressures measured on the boundary at the first collapse of a cavity attain a local minimum, while at the same time there is an increase in the duration of the pressure pulse. This contrasts with a monotonic increase in the peak pressures as the stand-off is reduced, when the cavity inception point is outside the stated interval. This phenomenon is shown to be due to a splash effect which follows the impact of the liquid jet. Three cases are chosen to typify the splash interaction with the free surface of the collapsing cavity: (i) surface reconnection around the liquid jet; (ii) splash impact at the base of the liquid jet; (iii) thin film splash. Hydrodynamic pressures generated following splash impact are found to be much greater than those produced by the jet impact. The combination of splash impact and the emission of shock waves, together with the subsequent re-expansion, drives the flow around the toroidal cavity producing a distinctive double pressure peak.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dynamics of the piezo inkjet printhead operation☆
Wijshoff, H. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.03.003 · Cited by 593
Dynamics of laser-induced cavitation bubbles near an elastic boundary
BRUJAN, E.-A., NAHEN, K., SCHMIDT, P., & VOGEL, A. (2001) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112000003347 · Cited by 417
High-Speed Imaging of Drops and Bubbles
Thoroddsen, S. T., Etoh, T. G., & Takehara, K. (2008) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102215 · Cited by 417
Tzanakis, I., Eskin, D. G., Georgoulas, A., & Fytanidis, D. K. (2014) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.10.003 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- TONG, R. P., SCHIFFERS, W. P., SHAW, S. J., BLAKE, J. R., & EMMONY, D. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-02-10
- Volume
- 380
- Pages
- 339-361
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2068092423
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of ‘splashing’ in the collapse of a laser-generated cavity near a rigid boundary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112098003589
- The paper
- TONG, R. P., SCHIFFERS, W. P., SHAW, S. J., BLAKE, J. R., & EMMONY, D. C. (1999). The role of ‘splashing’ in the collapse of a laser-generated cavity near a rigid boundary. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112098003589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.