Cited by 87Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing Impairment and CommunicationEar Surgery and Otitis Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf persons with additional disability

Daneshi, A, Hassanzadeh, S·2007·The Journal of Laryngology & Otology

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to identify the frequency with which the following conditions were present as a second disability in cochlear-implanted, prelingually deaf persons: mild and moderate mental retardation; learning disability; attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder; cerebral palsy; congenital blindness; and autism. We also aimed to document the development of auditory perception in patients having one of these additional disabilities. Study design: A retrospective study was designed to pursue the above aims. Methods: We examined the records of 398 cochlear-implanted, prelingually deaf patients who had received a cochlear implant at least one year previously. Patients were selected who showed a delay in motor, cognitive or emotional development. The selected cases were referred for psychological evaluation in order to identify patients with additional disabilities. We then compared these patients' auditory perception prior to and one year following cochlear implantation. Results: A total of 60 (15 per cent) cochlear-implanted, prelingually deaf patients were diagnosed with additional disabilities. These were classified as: mild mental retardation in eight cases (13.33 per cent); moderate mental retardation in five (8.33 per cent); learning disability in 20 (33.33 per cent); attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in 15 (25 per cent); cerebral palsy in five (8.33); congenital blindness in three (5 per cent); and autism in four (6.66 per cent). All patients showed significant development in speech perception, except for autistic and congenitally deaf-blind patients. Conclusion: Although cochlear implantation is not contraindicated in prelingually deaf persons with additional disabilities, congenitally deaf-blind and autistic patients showed limited development in auditory perception as a main outcome of cochlear implantation. These patients require unique rehabilitation in order to achieve more auditory development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022215107005051

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 87

Metadata

Authors
Daneshi, A., & Hassanzadeh, S.
Affiliations
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Venue
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
Published
2006-12-06
Volume
121
Issue
7
Pages
635-638
ISSN
  • 0022-2151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-5460
OpenAlex
W2156740468
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Keywords
cochlear implantation, prelingual deafness, additional disabilities, intellectual disability, learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cerebral palsy, congenital blindness, autism spectrum disorder, deafblindness, speech perception, auditory development, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Deafness, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Retrospective Studies, Cochlear Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review