Cited by 2Ear Surgery and Otitis MediaVestibular and auditory disordersHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long-term outcome of children undergoing surgery for suspected perilymph fistula

Sim, R J, Jardine, A H, Beckenham, E J·2009·The Journal of Laryngology & Otology

Abstract

A number of authors have suggested that surgery for suspected perilymph fistula is effective in preventing deterioration of hearing and in improving hearing in some cases in the short term. We present long-term hearing outcome data from 35 children who underwent exploration for presumed perilymph fistula at The Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia, between 1985 and 1992.Methods: The pre-operative audiological data (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz results) were compared with the most recently available data (range two to 15 years) and the six-month post-operative data. Results: The short-term results showed no significant change in hearing at six months, with a subsequent, statistically significant progression of hearing loss in both operated and non-operated ears (Wilcoxon signed rank test: operated ear, p < 0.017; non-operated ear, p < 0.009). Conclusion: In this case series, exploratory surgery for correction of suspected perilymph fistula did not prevent progression of long-term hearing loss.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022215108003046

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870180077015 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/019459989411000405 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/019459989010200203 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1288/00005537-198601000-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1177/019459988709600203 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0196-0709(02)32418-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sim, R. J., Jardine, A. H., & Beckenham, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Southmead Hospital (GB)
  • Royal United Hospital (GB)
  • Sydney Children's Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Sim, R J
Venue
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
Published
2008-06-25
Volume
123
Issue
3
Pages
298-302
ISSN
  • 0022-2151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-5460
OpenAlex
W2133666271
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
perilymphatic fistula, children, surgical exploration, hearing loss, hearing outcomes, long-term hearing outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Australia, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Fistula, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Perilymph, Prospective Studies, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Vestibular Diseases, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review