Cited by 4Ear Surgery and Otitis MediaSinusitis and nasal conditionsVestibular and auditory disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid sprays in relieving clinical signs of Eustachian tube dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials

Nibhanupudy, Tara J., Patel, Aneesh, Trinh, Caroline P., Jenkins, Elizabeth, Weber, Peter C., Levi, Jessica R.·2024·The Journal of Laryngology & Otology

Abstract

Objective: Eustachian tube dysfunction is prevalent in both paediatric and adult populations. Current clinical guidelines recommend observation over topical intranasal corticosteroids for Eustachian tube dysfunction management, which remains controversial. This study aimed to systematically review randomised, controlled trials assessing topical intranasal corticosteroid efficacy in Eustachian tube dysfunction, and analyse effect through tympanometric normalisation. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched. All randomised, controlled trials assessing intranasal corticosteroids in adult or paediatric Eustachian tube dysfunction patients were included. A meta-analysis of proportions was used to evaluate tympanogram normalisation. Results: Of 330 results, eight randomised, controlled trials met inclusion criteria and underwent qualitative data synthesis and risk-of-bias analysis. Meta-analysis of tympanometry data from four eligible trials (n = 512 ears) revealed no significant difference in tympanometric normalisation between intranasal corticosteroids and control (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.65–2.24). Conclusion: Study results do not strongly support intranasal corticosteroids for Eustachian tube dysfunction. Data were limited, emphasising the need for larger, higher quality, randomised, controlled trials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022215124000756

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nibhanupudy, T. J., Patel, A., Trinh, C. P., Jenkins, E., Weber, P. C., & Levi, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
  • A.T. Still University (US)
Corresponding author
Nibhanupudy, Tara J.
Venue
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
Published
2024-04-29
Volume
138
Issue
11
Pages
1065-1072
ISSN
  • 0022-2151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-5460
OpenAlex
W4396242982
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
Eustachian tube dysfunction, intranasal corticosteroids, nasal spray, tympanometry, pediatric patients, adults, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Acoustic Impedance Tests, Administration, Intranasal, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Ear Diseases, Eustachian Tube, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Nasal Sprays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review