The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some controversial questions in phonological theory
Abstract
In the first issue of this journal, Fred W. Householder discussed two papers of ours which he found defective in various respects. We feel that the issues involved are important and deserve the fullest clarification. We will therefore discuss Householder's objections and the underlying issues in some detail, reiterating points that have been made in the aforementioned papers and elsewhere and making no attempt to avoid redundancy if this can contribute to clarity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Self-citation
Cited by
Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast
Liljencrants, J., Lindblom, B., & Lindblom, B. (1972) · Language · doi:10.2307/411991 · Cited by 992
Disambiguatory Signals are Stronger in Word-initial Positions
Pimentel, T., Cotterell, R., & Roark, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.3 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Chomsky, N., & Halle, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1965-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-138
- ISSN
- 0022-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7742
- OpenAlex
- W1996056154
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some controversial questions in phonological theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022226700001134
- The paper
- Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1965). Some controversial questions in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700001134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
