Cited by 16Crime, Illicit Activities, and GovernancePolicing Practices and PerceptionsDiverse Research Studies Overview

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The politics of law enforcement in Nigeria: lessons from the war on drugs

Klantschnig, Gernot·2009·The Journal of Modern African Studies

Abstract

This article examines the institutional politics of law enforcement in Nigeria by focusing on illegal drug control since the mid 1980s. It assesses the available academic research on law enforcement governance, and contrasts it with an in-depth case study of drug law enforcement. The case study confirms views of the politicised nature of law enforcement. However, it goes beyond the patron–client centred approach to politics prevalent in the literature on African policing. The article adds an institutional dimension to the study of law enforcement governance, highlighting processes of centralisation, exclusion and shifting bureaucratic interests that have been central to the development of Nigerian drug law enforcement. It is based on previously inaccessible data from inside Nigerian drug law enforcement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022278x09990036

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Alemika, 1998, Narcotic Drugs Control Policy in Nigeria
  2. 10.7208/chicago/9780226114101.001.0001 · DOI
  3. Famuyiwa, 1990, The new drug law and the medical profession’, in Kalu and Osinbajo, Narcotics, 379
  4. Adamson, 1990, Memorandum’, in Kalu and Osinbajo, Narcotics, 406
  5. Kalu, Narcotics: law and policy in Nigeria
  6. Laniel L. 2006. ‘Cannabis in Africa: a cash crop to cushion the crises’, paper presented at the Workshop on Drugs and Alcohol in Africa, 23.5.6, St Antony's College, Oxford.
  7. Tamuno, 1970, The Police in Modern Nigeria: 1861–1965
  8. United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs (UN CND). 1975–91. Review/Data of the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, E/CN.7. Geneva/Vienna: UN CND.
  9. Klantschnig G. 2008. ‘The making of Nigeria's war on drugs: international cooperation and the politics of illicit substance control’, DPhil thesis in Politics, University of Oxford.
  10. Alemika, 2004, Analysis of Police and Policing in Nigeria
  11. Emafo, 1990, Drug regulation and social policy’, in Kalu and Osinbajo, Narcotics, 63

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Klantschnig, G.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
Corresponding author
Klantschnig, Gernot
Venue
The Journal of Modern African Studies
Published
2009-11-12
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
529-549
ISSN
  • 0022-278X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7777
OpenAlex
W2125185872
Cited by
16
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Modern African Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Research Studies Overview
Keywords
drug enforcement, war on drugs, institutional politics, Nigerian police, centralization, bureaucratic interests, clientelism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review