Older but wiser? Effects of age on political cognition
Abstract
In experimental studies of voter's information processing, Lau and Redlawsk (2006) found one control variable to have pervasive effects in their analyses: age. Age was associated with less information search, less memory, less accurate memory, and a lower probability of making a correct vote. Reexamining those experimental studies, we find that inexperience with computers and slower manual dexterity are both associated with less information access, but controlling on these factors, age continues to have a strong negative effect on information processing. In other more familiar situations, however, political knowledge can accumulate with greater experience, as it does with memories for actual presidential candidates and political parties, although this effect reverses at very advanced ages. Age has minimal effects on the probability of correct voting until the mid-60s, but we observe very sharp drop-offs thereafter. The normative implications of these findings for democratic representativeness are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Young people seek and remember more political information than older adults.
“Other studies have found that young people are better at discerning fake news online than adults (Guess et al., 2019) and seek and remember more political information than older adults (Lau and Redlawsk, 2008).”
From The role (and limits) of developmental neuroscience in determining adolescents' autonomy rights: The case for reproductive and voting rights (2024) · cites this paper as Lau and Redlawsk, 2008
Cites
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition
Salthouse, T. A. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 · Cited by 5,568 · see citing works
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208812 · Cited by 1,344 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maslowsky, J., Buss, E., & Wray-Lake, L. (2024) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101435 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Other studies have found that young people are better at discerning fake news online than adults (Guess et al., 2019) and seek and remember more political information than older adults (Lau and Redlawsk, 2008).”
- Authors
- Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 168-185
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W2134168907
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Politics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- political cognition, information processing, information search, memory, political knowledge, manual dexterity, older voters, presidential candidates, political parties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review