The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks
Abstract
Why are some terrorist organizations so much more deadly then others? This article examines organizational characteristics such as ideology, size, age, state sponsorship, alliance connections, and control of territory while controlling for factors that may also influence lethality, including the political system and relative wealth of the country in which the organization is based. Using data from the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism's Terrorism Knowledge Base (TKB), we use a negative binomial model of organizational lethality, finding that organizational size, ideology, territorial control, and connectedness are important predictors of lethality while state sponsorship, organizational age, and host country characteristics are not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,518
Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226464 · Cited by 7,381
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables.
MTW, & Long, J. S. (1997) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2965458 · Cited by 6,898
Regression Analysis of Count Data
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013567 · Cited by 6,640
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables
Calvin, J. A. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1998.10485496 · Cited by 5,201
Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata
Long, J. S., & Jeremy Freese, A. (2014) · Cited by 4,624
From Mobilization to Revolution
Tilly, C. (2017) · Collective Violence, Contentious Politics, and Social Change · doi:10.4324/9781315205021-5 · Cited by 3,999
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?
Brewer, M. B. (1999) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126 · Cited by 3,494
Politics among nations;: The struggle for power and peace
Morgenthau, H. J. (1972) · Cited by 3,377
Regression standard errors in clustered samples
Rogers, W. H. (1993) · Stata technical bulletin · Cited by 2,694
Cited by
Religion, terrorism and public goods: Testing the club model
Berman, E., & Laitin, D. D. (2008) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.03.007 · Cited by 474
Bombing Alone: Tracing the Motivations and Antecedent Behaviors of Lone‐Actor Terrorists,,
Gill, P., Horgan, J., & Deckert, P. (2014) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12312 · Cited by 451
Power-law distributions in binned empirical data
Virkar, Y., & Clauset, A. (2014) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aoas710 · Cited by 209
Carey, S. C., & Mitchell, N. J. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051915-045433 · Cited by 106
Taming the Gods: How Religious Conflict Shapes State Repression
Henne, P. S., & Klocek, J. (2019) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717728104 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Asal, V., & Rethemeyer, R. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 437-449
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W2148342897
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 31.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022381608080419
- The paper
- Asal, V., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2008). The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608080419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.