CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 436Urban and Rural Development ChallengesLatin American Urban StudiesUrban Development and Societal Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Latin American Squatter Settlements: A Problem and a Solution

Open access
Mangin, William·1967·Latin American Research Review
DOI 10.1017/s002387910001534x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Squatter settlements have formed around large cities throughout the world, mushrooming particularly since the end of World War II. In an excellent preview to a forthcoming book, Turner (1966) has discussed some common features among squatter settlements in Latin America, Asia, Africa, and Europe. Morse (1965a) has also referred to squatter communities and to general characteristics of Latin American urbanization in an article in this journal. Without repeating the work of Turner and Morse I would like to present a preliminary survey of Latin American squatter settlements with a model of their formation, growth, and social development that contradicts many views held by planners, politicians, newspapermen, and much of the general population, including many residents of the settlements themselves. Several writers have referred to various local names given to squatter communities:colonies proletarias in Mexico,barriadas brujas in Panama, ranchos in Venezuela, barriadas in Peru, callampas in Chile, cantegriles in Uruguay, favelas in Brazil, and, in other places, marginal areas, clandestine urbanizations, barrios of invasion, parachutists, phantom towns, etc. There are no general works on the subject, but some good descriptions of local conditions do exist. The major sources used are listed by country in note 2. Not many sources are available and, unfortunately, several appear only in mimeographed form. The reports point out that squatter populations consist mainly of low income families but all of the authors distinguish between squatter settlements and other types of lower class housing in tenements, alleys (callejones), shack yards tcoralones, jacales), and rented slum buildings. They agree, sometimes to their own surprise, that it is difficult to describe squatter settlements as slums. The differentiation of squatter settlements from inner-city slums is, in fact, one of the first breaks from the widely shared mythology about them. (See, for example, Patch, 1961; Mangin, 1965.) The purpose in noting this mythology is not merely to set up a straw man for the paper. A review of the “Chaos, Crisis, Revolution and Wither Now Latin America” literature, or, of most governmental, United Nations, or AID reports, or, of most newspapers and magazines in Latin America will show that it is the predominant position on squatter settlements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s002387910001534x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Corten, 1965, Como vive la otra mitad de Santo Domingo: estudio de dualismo estructural, Caribbean Studies, 4, 3
  2. Jones, 1964, Aspects of urbanization in Venezuela, Ekistics, 18, 109
  3. Peattie, Lisa 1966 Social issues in housing. Joint Center for Urban Studies. (Mimeographed). Cambridge, Mass.
  4. Mangin, 1959, The role of regional associations in the adaptation of rural population in Peru, Sociologus, 9, 21
  5. Mangin, 1960, Mental health and migration to cities. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 84, 17, 911
  6. Whitten, Norman E. Jr . 1962 Urbanization and Political Extremism. (Mimeographed). Cambridge, Mass.
  7. Mangin, William 1967 Comunidades de la sierra de América Indígena. (In press).
  8. Harth Deneke, Jorge 1966 The colonias proletarias of Mexico City, low income settlements on the urban fringe. Master's thesis in City Planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Mass.
  9. Safa, 1964, From shantytown to public housing: a comparison of family structure in two urban neighborhoods in Puerto Rico, Caribbean Studies, 4, 3
  10. Butterworth, 1962, A study of the urbanization process among the Mixtec migrants from Tilantongo in Mexico City, América Indígena, 22, 257
  11. Herrick, Bruce H. 1966 Urban Migration and Economic Development in Chile. Cambridge, Mass.
  12. Morse, 1965b, The sociology of San Juan: an exegesis of urban mythology, Caribbean Studies, 5, 45
  13. Mangin, William 1964 Sociological, cultural and political characteristics of some rural Indians and urban migrants in Peru. Wenner-Gren Symposium on Cross-Cultural Similarities in the Urbanization Process. (Mimeographed).
  14. Simmons, 1952, El uso de los conceptos de aculturación y asimilación en el estudio del cambio cultural en el Perú, Perú Indígena, 2, 40
  15. Koth, Marcia , Silva, Julia and Dietz, Albert 1964 Housing in Latin America. Cambridge, Mass.
  16. Abrams, Charles 1964 Man's Struggle for Shelter in an Urbanizing World. Cambridge, Mass.
  17. Schaedel, 1966, Urban growth and ekistics on the Peruvian coast, 36th International Congress of Americanists, 1, 531

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 436

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mangin, W.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
Mangin, William
Venue
Latin American Research Review
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1967
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
65-98
ISSN
  • 0023-8791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4278
DOI
10.1017/s002387910001534x
OpenAlex
W3149007343
Cited by
428
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
56.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 20385 d)
Locations
Latin American Research Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Latin American Urban Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Development and Societal Issues
Keywords
informal settlements, Latin America, urbanization, slums, favelas, barriadas, social development, low-income housing, urban planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review