The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrofauna production in an estuarine mud-flat
Abstract
The importance of the extensive intertidal mud-flats to the energy budget of estuaries has frequently been stressed, but seldom quantified. Smidt (1951) has discussed the production of both macro- and meiofauna from the Danish Waddens in general terms but, because of the wide coverage, his information is not detailed enough to quantify annual production in terms of g/m 2. The present study was designed to compare the productive importance of macrofauna and meiofauna in detail at a single site. This paper deals only with the first phase of this study, the macrofauna, which are retained on a 0.5 mm sieve for the major part of their productive life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relation between production and biomass
Allen, K. R. (1971) · Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada · doi:10.1139/f71-236 · Cited by 590
Cited by
Siphon size and burying depth in deposit- and suspension-feeding benthic bivalves
Zwarts, L., & Wanink, J. (1989) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00391963 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Warwick, R. M., & Price, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1975-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0025-3154 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7769
- OpenAlex
- W2124279704
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrofauna production in an estuarine mud-flat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0025315400015721
- The paper
- Warwick, R. M., & Price, R. (1975). Macrofauna production in an estuarine mud-flat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315400015721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
