Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feeding behaviour of the mussel,Mytilus edulis: responses to variations in quantity and organic content of the seston

Bayne, B. L., Iglesias, J. I. P., Hawkins, A. J. S., Navarro, E., Heral, M., Deslous-Paoli, J. M.·1993·Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Abstract

Mussels were fed four concentrations of seston (between 0·99 and 10·3 mg total seston I−1), comprising three levels of organic content (71·9, 63·6 and 40·8%), made up from natural silt and two species of cultured phytoplankton. Two of the seston concentrations were below, and two above, the threshold at which pseudofaeces were produced. Measurements of physiological traits (filtration rates, pseudofaeces production, selection efficiency, absorption efficiency, absorption rates and rates of oxygen consumption) were made after 2 days and, for two of the seston concentrations, also after 12 days. When fed at a high concentration of seston of low organic content, the mussels increased their filtration rate, rejected a higher proportion of filtered material as pseudofaeces, and increased the efficiency with which filtered matter of higher organic content was selected for ingestion; this resulted in a constancy of the relationship between ingestion rate and the concentration of particulate organic matter, regardless of differences in seston organic content. Between 2 and 12 d, the mussels increased absorption rates for organics, primarily by increasing absorption efficiency, both for total organics and for the carbohydrate component of the diet. We suggest that these responses to changes in the food environment comprise physiological adjustments which result in higher net rates of absorption than would be predicted from considerations only of the organic/inorganic ratio of the suspended particles and assumptions of a non-compensating feeding behaviour.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0025315400034743

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Bayne, B. L., Iglesias, J. I. P., Hawkins, A. J. S., Navarro, E., Heral, M., & Deslous-Paoli, J. M.
Venue
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
Published
1993-11
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
813-829
ISSN
  • 0025-3154 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7769
OpenAlex
W1998326403
Cited by
315
References
2
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feeding behaviour of the mussel,Mytilus edulis: responses to variations in quantity and organic content of the seston. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0025315400034743
The paper
Bayne, B. L., Iglesias, J. I. P., Hawkins, A. J. S., Navarro, E., Heral, M., & Deslous-Paoli, J. M. (1993). Feeding behaviour of the mussel,Mytilus edulis: responses to variations in quantity and organic content of the seston. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315400034743

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.