CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Biblical Studies and InterpretationKarl Barth and Christian TheologyReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abraham in Romans 4: The Father of All Who Believe

Cranford, Michael·1995·New Testament Studies
DOI 10.1017/s0028688500022955
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In Romans 4 Paul turns to the scriptural figure of Abraham, a vivid personification of faith and obedience in Jewish thought. While the most obvious reason for Paul's depiction of Abraham is to undermine any use of Abraham as a counterexample to his foregoing argument, Paul turns the common Jewish conception of Abraham on its head and offers him instead as positive support for his own position. The nature of Paul's argument in the previous two chapters of Romans has been identified by James Dunn and others as rejecting the Jewish assumption that covenant privileges are strictly associated with ethnic Israel and therefore unavailable to Gentiles. Over against the Torah, Paul has instead offered faith as the identifier or boundary marker of those who are members in God's people – a difference which allows Gentiles full participation in the covenant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0028688500022955

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Moisés, 1991, The Law and Christianity: Dunn's New Synthesis, WTJ, 53, 352
  2. ‘Works of the Law and the Curse of the Law’ and ‘The New Perspective on Paul’, Jesus, Paul and the Law (Louisville: West-minster/John Knox Press, 1990) 183–241.
  3. Hendrikus, 1971, Theology out of the Ghetto, 84
  4. Barrett, 1957, Romans, 87
  5. Rengstorf, σημεῖον, TDNT, 258
  6. Matthew, 1973, Romans, 68
  7. Dunn, 1988, Romans
  8. George, 1990, Paul: Crisis in Galatia, 55
  9. Jan, 1985, Why Is Boasting Excluded? A Note on Rom 3,27 and 4,2, ETL, 61, 366
  10. Robertson, 1980, Genesis 15:6: New Covenant Expositions of an Old Covenant Text, WTJ, 42, 265
  11. Moo, 1991, Romans, 266
  12. Gale , The Use of Analogy in the Letters of Paul, 174.
  13. Davies, 1990, Faith and Obedience in Romans, 145
  14. Wright, 1992, Society of Biblical Literature 1992 Seminar Papers, 184

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cranford, M.
Affiliations
Biola University (US)
Corresponding author
Cranford, Michael
Venue
New Testament Studies
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1995-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
71-88
ISSN
  • 0028-6885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8145
DOI
10.1017/s0028688500022955
OpenAlex
W2042196240
Cited by
13
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 5149 d)
Locations
New Testament Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Keywords
Abraham, Romans 4, Pauline theology, faith, justification, covenant, Gentiles, Jewish philosophy, James Dunn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review