Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Blood from Abel to Zechariah in the History of Interpretation

Gallagher, Edmon L.·2014·New Testament Studies

Abstract

The saying in the Gospels about the blood ‘from Abel to Zechariah’ has generated a number of theories regarding the identity of Zechariah and why Jesus specifically mentions these two victims. While a prominent interpretation today regards the names as pointing to the bookends of the Hebrew Bible, the Greek and Latin Fathers had their own peculiar ways of solving the exegetical puzzles connected to the saying. It seems that the invention of the printing press, and the stable sequence of books it created, exerted an influence on the development of the popular modern view.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0028688513000246

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Hahn, 2009, Canon Hebraeorum – Canon Ecclesiae: Zur deuterokanonischen Frage im Rahmen der Begründung alttestamentlicher Schriftkanonizität in neuerer römisch-katholischer Dogmatik
  2. Witherington, 2006, Matthew
  3. Green, 1898, General Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon, 201
  4. Wolfendale, 1890, A Homiletical Commentary on the Books of Chronicles
  5. Gandell, 1859, Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae: Hebrew and Talmudical Exercitations
  6. Turner, 2008, Matthew
  7. 1555, Harmonia ex tribus evangelistis composita, Matthaeo, Marco and Luca adjuncto seorsum Johanne, quod pauca cum aliis communia habeat cum Joh. Calvini commentariis
  8. Syncellus, 1984, Ecloga chronographica, 220
  9. Gallagher, 2013, Studia Patristica, 69, 99
  10. 1974, The Greek Chronicles: The Relation of the Septuagint of 1 and 2 Chronicles to the Massoretic Text
  11. Weber, 1945, Les anciennes versions latines du deuxième livre des Paralipomènes
  12. Bonnard, 1979, Saint Jérôme: Commentaire sur Saint Matthieu, 2
  13. de Wette, 1843, A Critical and Historical Introduction to the Canonical Scriptures of the Old Testament
  14. Dorival, 2003, The Biblical Canons, 81
  15. 10.12987/yale/9780300164343.001.0001 · doi:10.12987/yale/9780300164343.001.0001
  16. Lightfoot, 1989, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica
  17. Field, 1875, Origenis Hexaplorum quae supersunt
  18. Luz, 2005, Matthew 21–28: A Commentary, 150
  19. Wilkins, 2004, Matthew, 756
  20. Klostermann, 1933, Origenes Werke 11/2: Origenes Matthäuserklärung
  21. Brooke, 1932, The Old Testament in Greek: According to the Text of Codex Vaticanus, 2.3:i and ii Chronicles
  22. Barrera, 2002, The Canon Debate, 128
  23. Marcos, 1997, Congress of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies, Cambridge, 1995, 123
  24. Garland, 2011, Luke
  25. Wellhausen, 1904, Das Evangelium Matthaei: Übersetzt und erklärt, 119
  26. Niese, 1885, Flavii Iosephi opera, 2, 302
  27. Carr, 1996, A Gift of God in Due Season, 22

Metadata

Authors
Gallagher, E. L.
Affiliations
Heritage Christian University (US)
Corresponding author
Gallagher, Edmon L.
Venue
New Testament Studies
Published
2013-12-16
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
121-138
ISSN
  • 0028-6885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8145
OpenAlex
W2313734245
Cited by
6
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Testament Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Keywords
Gospel of Matthew, Zechariah, Abel, biblical exegesis, Church Fathers, Greek patristic literature, Latin patristic literature, printing press, biblical canon, exegesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Blood from Abel to Zechariah in the History of Interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0028688513000246
The paper
Gallagher, E. L. (2014). The Blood from Abel to Zechariah in the History of Interpretation. New Testament Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688513000246

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.