Cited by 15Biblical Studies and InterpretationKarl Barth and Christian TheologyReformation and Early Modern Christianity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Jesus' Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews, Once Again: A Brief Response to Jean-René Moret

Moffitt, David M.·2016·New Testament Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0028688515000508

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Moffitt, D. M.
Affiliations
University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Moffitt, David M.
Venue
New Testament Studies
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
308-314
ISSN
  • 0028-6885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8145
OpenAlex
W2266343545
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
FWCI
66.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New Testament Studies (publishedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Keywords
resurrection of Jesus, Epistle to the Hebrews, New Testament exegesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review