Shifting adolescents’ interest and motivation in health and healthy eating to promote a healthy and sustainable lifestyle
Open accessAbstract
Adolescents are a group to target with behaviour change interventions as they are developing their lifelong beliefs and behaviours that influence health into adulthood. The aim was to assess whether students' interest and motivation in health and healthy eating would change after an 8-week co-design intervention about healthy eating, food waste, and recipe development. Interest and motivations were assessed using the previously developed Living and Eating for Health Segments. An 8-week co-design intervention was piloted in an independent school during Year 8 (age 13-14 years) Food Technology classes. Students were taught about food waste, as well as healthy eating and the Australian Dietary Guidelines, The co-design intervention involved students working in small groups to use leftover ingredients in the pantry to create a delicious meal suited to their needs. Students' needs from a recipe were identified early in the intervention through a co-creation activity that asked them 'what is important to you in a recipe?' They completed a pre-and post-intervention questionnaire and were asked to select a statement that reflected their interest and motivation in health and healthy eating. Previous research Forty students participated across both time points (n = 21 male, n = 18 female, n = 1 gender fluid). The co-creation activity identified factors that were important in their recipes such as preparation time, accessibility and cost of ingredients, allergens, difficulty level, sustainability, and healthiness. Overall, there was a change in students' interest and motivation in health and healthy eating across the intervention period. The proportion of LM increased from 7.5% to 17.5% of participants, HC doubled from 20% to 40%, AHE increased from 12.5% of the participants to 22.5% and BU increased from 0% to 2.5%. Both CAD and BAR had a reduction in participants across the intervention, with CAD going from 15% to 0% and BAR from 45.0% to 17.5% of participants. The pilot intervention focussed on food waste was successful in changing students' interest and motivation in health and healthy eating. Co-creating recipe criteria was helpful in understanding what adolescents value in recipes and indicated that they care about the healthiness and sustainability of their food. Students who were 'on the fence' in the Contemplating Another Day segment, were all shifted to other segments that had more of an interest in health and healthy eating. The intervention holds promise in promoting health and sustainability within the school environment and should be scaled up to test in different age groups and populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of effective components within the collaborative individual- and system-level approach for adolescents aged 10 to 19 years involved shaping knowledge through educational instructions and experiments, creating associations with stimuli that cue healthy behaviours, and establishing antecedents to facilitate healthy food choices.
“However, our review found that the combination of effective components within the collaborative individual- and system-level approach for adolescents aged 10 to 19 years involved shaping knowledge through educational instructions and experiments, creating associations with stimuli that cue healthy behaviours, and establishing antecedents to facilitate healthy food choices [17, 19, 53, 54].”
From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
Combining system and individual-level interventions can create supportive environments that underpin and perpetuate changes in individual behaviour.
“Combining system and individual-level interventions can create supportive environments that underpin and perpetuate changes in individual behaviour [17, 19, 53, 54].”
From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review
Samad, N., Bearne, L., Noor, F. M., Akter, F., & Parmar, D. (2024) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-024-01668-6 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Combining system and individual-level interventions can create supportive environments that underpin and perpetuate changes in individual behaviour [17, 19, 53, 54].”
Background
- Authors
- Jenkins, E. L., Brennan, L., & McCaffrey, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- RMIT University (AU)
- ORCID
- Jenkins, E.L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- OCE2
- ISSN
- 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2719
- OpenAlex
- W4360596033
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
- Keywords
- adolescents, healthy eating, food waste, interest and motivation, recipe development, food technology education, sustainable diets, behavior change, school-based intervention, Australian Dietary Guidelines, food sustainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review