The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does forest certification conserve biodiversity?
Open accessAbstract
Forest certification provides a means by which producers who meet stringent sustainable forestry standards can identify their products in the marketplace, allowing them to potentially receive greater market access and higher prices for their products. An examination of the ways in which certification may contribute to biodiversity conservation leads to the following conclusions: 1) the process of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certification generates improvements to management with respect to the value of managed forests for biodiversity. 2) Current incentives are not sufficient to attract the majority of producers to seek certification, particularly in tropical countries where the costs of improving management to meet FSC guidelines are significantly greater than any market benefits they may receive; available incentives are even less capable of convincing forest owners to retain forest cover and produce certified timber on a sustainable basis, rather than deforesting their lands for timber and agriculture. 3) At present, current volumes of certified forest products are insufficient to reduce demand to log high conservation value forests. If FSC certification is to make greater inroads, particularly in tropical countries, significant investments will be needed both to increase the benefits and reduce the costs of certification. Conservation investors will need to carefully consider the biodiversity benefits that will be generated from such investments, versus the benefits generated from investing in more traditional approaches to biodiversity conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity?
Brockerhoff, E. G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J. A., Quine, C. P., & Sayer, J. (2008) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x · Cited by 1,239
Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions
Lambin, E. F., Meyfroidt, P., Rueda, X., Blackman, A., Börner, J., Cerutti, P. O., Dietsch, T., Jungmann, L., Lamarque, P., Lister, J., et al. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.007 · Cited by 512
Life after logging: reconciling wildlife conservation and production forestry in Indonesian Borneo
E., M., D., S., R., N., D., A., B., R., D., I., T., S., A., L., I., R., A., W., et al. (2005) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/001663 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Gullison, R. E.
- Venue
- Oryx
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-165
- ISSN
- 0030-6053 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3008
- OpenAlex
- W2170204897
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does forest certification conserve biodiversity? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0030605303000346
- The paper
- Gullison, R. E. (2003). Does forest certification conserve biodiversity? Oryx. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605303000346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.