Cited by 95Parasite Biology and Host InteractionsParasites and Host InteractionsHelminth infection and control

Interactions involving intestinal nematodes of rodents experimental and field studies

Open access
BEHNKE, J. M., BAJER, A., SINSKI, E., WAKELIN, D.·2001·Parasitology

Abstract

Multiple species infections with parasitic helminths, including nematodes, are common in wild rodent populations. In this paper we first define different types of associations and review experimental evidence for different categories of interactions. We conclude that whilst laboratory experiments have demonstrated unequivocally that both synergistic and antagonistic interactions involving nematodes exist, field work utilizing wild rodents has generally led to the conclusion that interactions between nematode species play no, or at most a minor, role in shaping helminth component communities. Nevertheless, we emphasize that analysis of interactions between parasites in laboratory systems has been fruitful, has made a fundamental contribution to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying host-protective intestinal immune responses, and has provided a rationale for studies on polyparasitism in human beings and domestic animals. Finally, we consider the practical implications for transmission of zoonotic diseases to human communities and to their domestic animals, and we identify the questions that merit research priority.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0031182000016796

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The similar lack of antagonistic interactions between cooccurring nematodes was demonstrated in wild rodents populations.

    “The similar lack of antagonistic interactions between cooccurring nematodes was demonstrated in wild rodents populations [25].”
  • The authors of the cited paper concluded that this type of interaction is observed relatively often in experimental infections; however, in wild animal populations, it occurs very rarely.

    “The authors of this paper concluded that this type of interaction is observed relatively often in experimental infections; however, in wild animal populations, it occurs very rarely [24,25].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BEHNKE, J. M., BAJER, A., SINSKI, E., & WAKELIN, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
Venue
Parasitology
Published
2001-03
Volume
122
Issue
S1
Pages
S39-S49
ISSN
  • 0031-1820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8161
OpenAlex
W2043700850
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
intestinal nematodes, polyparasitism, parasite interactions, synergistic interaction, antagonism, wild rodents, host immune response, zoonotic transmission, domestic animals
MeSH terms
Animals, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Host-Parasite Interactions, Intestines, Nematoda, Nematode Infections, Rodent Diseases, Rodentia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review