The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of macroparasite abundance and aggregation in wildlife populations: a quantitative review
Abstract
SUMMARY: In this paper we review the published literature on patterns of abundance and aggregation of macroparasites in wildlife host populations. We base this survey on quantitative analyses of mean burden and a number of measures of the degree of aggregation of parasite burdens between hosts. All major parasite and vertebrate host taxa were represented in the database. Mean parasite burden was found to be log-normally distributed, indicating that all parasite burdens are regulated to some degree. In addition, all but one of the parasitic infections were aggregated with respect to their hosts, and the relationship between log mean parasite burden and log variance was found to be very strong (R 2= 0·87). That is, for a given mean parasite burden there are constraints on the degree of variation in individual host burdens. The aggregated nature of the parasitic infections is also apparent from other measures of the degree of aggregation: prevalence – mean relationships, and the negative binomial parameter,k. Using a relatively new technique for parasitological infection data – tree-based models, as well as traditional linear models – a number of the parasitic infections was found to be associated with systematically lower or higher parasite burdens. Possible biological explanations for these and other patterns are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aggregation, Variance and the Mean
TAYLOR, L. R. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/189732a0 · Cited by 2,496
Cited by
Ecological models and data in R
Bolker, B. M. (2008) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4g37 · Cited by 1,297
“142) tell us there is some form of environmental variation or aggregative response among individuals that we haven’t taken into account (Shaw and Dobson, 1995).”
BackgroundAnalysis of aggregation, a worked example: numbers of ticks on red grouse chicks
ELSTON, D. A., MOSS, R., BOULINIER, T., ARROWSMITH, C., & LAMBIN, X. (2001) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182001007740 · Cited by 409
Hawley, D. M., & Altizer, S. M. (2011) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01753.x · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, D. J., & Dobson, A. P.
- Venue
- Parasitology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S111-S133
- ISSN
- 0031-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8161
- OpenAlex
- W2148776647
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of macroparasite abundance and aggregation in wildlife populations: a quantitative review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0031182000075855
- The paper
- Shaw, D. J., & Dobson, A. P. (1995). Patterns of macroparasite abundance and aggregation in wildlife populations: a quantitative review. Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000075855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.