The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Management and remediation of contaminated sites at Casey Station, Antarctica
Open accessAbstract
The Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty requires that past and present work sites be cleaned up unless removal would result in greater adverse environmental impact than leaving the contaminant in its existing location. In the early 1990s Australia began the documentation of contaminated sites associated with its research stations, which resulted in an extensive record of contamination at abandoned stations and waste-disposal sites. Currently the technical capability to remediate these sites does not exist because of environmental challenges that are unique to the cold regions. Investigations indicate that clean-up operations in the past have proceeded without adequate precautions and without effective monitoring. To address these problems, three research priorities have been identified to assist meeting international and national obligations to clean up these sites. They are: understanding contaminant mobilisation processes; development of ecological risk assessment for use in monitoring and setting priorities; and development of clean-up and remediation procedures. This study provides sufficient information to guide the completion of a clean-up at Casey Station and to indicate how other similar sites should be managed. The next stage is to develop the theory into an operational plan to include detailed protocols for clean-up, monitoring, site remediation, and management of the waste stream from site to final repository. To achieve this, the Australian Antarctic Division has established a contaminated sites taskforce to facilitate the transition from research and development of techniques to implementation of suitable clean-up options.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Remediation of soil and water contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon: A review
Ossai, I. C., Ahmed, A., Hassan, A., & Hamid, F. S. (2020) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2019.100526 · Cited by 895
Wu, M., Dick, W. A., Li, W., Wang, X., Yang, Q., Wang, T., Xu, L., Zhang, M., & Chen, L. (2016) · International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation · doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.11.019 · Cited by 367
Wild, S., McLagan, D., Schlabach, M., Bossi, R., Hawker, D., Cropp, R., King, C. K., Stark, J. S., Mondon, J., & Nash, S. B. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5048232 · Cited by 120
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Snape, I., Riddle, M. J., Stark, J. S., Cole, C. M., King, C. K., Duquesne, S., & Gore, D. B.
- Venue
- Polar Record
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 202
- Pages
- 199-214
- ISSN
- 0032-2474 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3057
- OpenAlex
- W2088218846
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management and remediation of contaminated sites at Casey Station, Antarctica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0032247400027236
- The paper
- Snape, I., Riddle, M. J., Stark, J. S., Cole, C. M., King, C. K., Duquesne, S., & Gore, D. B. (2001). Management and remediation of contaminated sites at Casey Station, Antarctica. Polar Record. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400027236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.