Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 45Psychological Testing and AssessmentPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new interview for the multiaxial assessment of psychiatric morbidity in medical settings

Lobo, Antonio, Campos, Ricardo, Pérez-Echeverría, M.-Jesús, Izuzquiza, Julián, García-Campayo, Javier, Saz, Pedro, Marcos, Guillermo·1993·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Synopsis: A new semistructured instrument, the Standardized Polyvalent Psychiatric Interview or SPPI has been developed primarily for assessing medical patients. It has been built on the Clinical Interview Schedule and is intended to evaluate individuals in a multiaxial schema: psychopathology, including duration and severity of disorder; somatic disturbance; social problems and social supports: and pre-morbid personality, with especial emphasis on ‘neuroticism’. The SPPI generates enough information to allow the use of different research diagnostic criteria, including DSM-III-R, ICD-10 and Goldberg's criteria of ‘attribution’ of somatic symptoms and ‘relationships between psychiatric and physical disorder’. It also includes a section related to recommended treatment. The new interview fulfils standards of feasibility, face and content validity. An incomplete block design, inter-rater reliability study was carried out with a consecutive sample of 48 out-patients referred to the Psychosomatic-Liaison Service of the University Hospital of Zaragoza. A broad range of agreement coefficients were calculated, the results being quite acceptable (most kappas are in the range from 0·7 to 0·9) and tending to support the procedural validity of the interview.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291700028592

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 1990, ICD-10. Mental and Behavioural Disorders
  2. Wing, 1974, The Description and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms: An Instruction Manual for the PSE and CATEGO System
  3. Lobo, 1992, Disagio psichico e malattie somatiche, Psychiatria and Medicina, 6, 7
  4. Lobo, 1979, El ‘Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo’: Un test sencillo, práctico, para detectar alteraciones intelectivas en pacientes médicos, Actas Luso-Españolas de Neurología y Psiquiatría, VII, 189
  5. Jenkins, 1988, Classification of Mental Disorder in Primary Care. Psychological Medicine (Monograph Supplement 12)
  6. Goldberg, 1983, Handbook of Psychiatry: 4 The Neuroses and Personality Disorders, 194
  7. 1987, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  8. Lobo, 1984, Estudio de la entrevista psiquiátrica estructurada CIS en pacientes españoles, Comunicación Psiquiátrica, 11, 43

Cited by

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Lobo, A., Campos, R., Pérez-Echeverría, M.-J., Izuzquiza, J., García-Campayo, J., Saz, P., & Marcos, G.
Affiliations
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1993-05
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
505-510
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2101333063
Cited by
45
References
23
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
medical patients, multiaxial assessment, Clinical Interview Schedule, neuroticism, somatic symptoms, psychosomatic disorders, inter-rater reliability, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Assessment, Personality Disorders, Primary Health Care, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Sick Role, Social Adjustment, Social Support, Somatoform Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.