Does Beck's Hopelessness Scale really measure several components?
Abstract
Background Much of the interest in hopelessness stems from the key role it plays in the prediction of suicidal behaviour. To measure hopelessness. Beck el al. (1974) developed a 20-item scale (BHS), applied exploratory factor analysis and argued that the scale measures three specific components (affective, motivational and cognitive). Subsequent exploratory factor analyses identified two, three or more factors underlying the scale. Methods Several confirmatory factor analyses (LISREL) were run on data on 324 suicide attempters in Sweden in order to test the hypothesized factorial structures and to investigate the psychometric properties of the individual items. Results Neither three- nor two-factor models fitted the data. A simpler structure was sufficient to account for the observed correlations between most of the items. This led to the development of several variants of a one-factor model, each a combination of affective, motivational and cognitive items. The number of items varied between four and 15. Conclusions Our findings suggest that most of the items (15) of Beck's Hopelessness Scale measure one factor. They further suggest that the number of items could considerably be reduced. A four-item scale produced an excellent fit. It includes positive and negative items describing the perception of the future in terms of success, darkness, lack of opportunity and faith. It might even be possible to replace the total scale with one item only, 'my future seems dark to me'.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408 · see citing works
The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale
Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037562 · Cited by 5,494 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Three-Step Theory (3ST): A New Theory of Suicide Rooted in the “Ideation-to-Action” Framework
Klonsky, E. D., & May, A. M. (2015) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1521/ijct.2015.8.2.114 · Cited by 1,799 · see citing works
Johnson, J., Gooding, P., & Tarrier, N. (2008) · Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice · doi:10.1348/147608307x244996 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Hopelessness and positive and negative future thinking in parasuicide
MacLeod, A. K., Tata, P., Tyrer, P., Schmidt, U., Davidson, K., & Thompson, S. (2005) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466505x35704 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Balsamo, M., Carlucci, L., Innamorati, M., Lester, D., & Pompili, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00727 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Factor validity of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in Italian medical patients
Innamorati, M., Lester, D., Balsamo, M., Erbuto, D., Ricci, F., Amore, M., Girardi, P., & Pompili, M. (2014) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9380-3 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Privacy helplessness on social media: Its constituents, antecedents and consequences
Cho, H. (2022) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-05-2020-0269 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Gnan, G., Rahman, Q., & Rimes, K. A. (2022) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2022.2058871 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Cronbach’s alpha was 0.76 for Time 1, 0.77 for Time 2 and 0.78 for Time 3 (Aish et al., 2001).”
MethodInfluential
- Authors
- AISH, A.-M., & WASSERMAN, D.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- ORCID
- WASSERMAN, DANUTA
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 367-372
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2054963708
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- hopelessness, suicidal behavior, suicide attempters, factor structure, psychometric properties, scale reduction, perceptions of the future
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Motivation, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suicide, Attempted, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review