Cited by 148Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Does Beck's Hopelessness Scale really measure several components?

AISH, ANNE-MARIE, WASSERMAN, DANUTA·2001·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background Much of the interest in hopelessness stems from the key role it plays in the prediction of suicidal behaviour. To measure hopelessness. Beck el al. (1974) developed a 20-item scale (BHS), applied exploratory factor analysis and argued that the scale measures three specific components (affective, motivational and cognitive). Subsequent exploratory factor analyses identified two, three or more factors underlying the scale. Methods Several confirmatory factor analyses (LISREL) were run on data on 324 suicide attempters in Sweden in order to test the hypothesized factorial structures and to investigate the psychometric properties of the individual items. Results Neither three- nor two-factor models fitted the data. A simpler structure was sufficient to account for the observed correlations between most of the items. This led to the development of several variants of a one-factor model, each a combination of affective, motivational and cognitive items. The number of items varied between four and 15. Conclusions Our findings suggest that most of the items (15) of Beck's Hopelessness Scale measure one factor. They further suggest that the number of items could considerably be reduced. A four-item scale produced an excellent fit. It includes positive and negative items describing the perception of the future in terms of success, darkness, lack of opportunity and faith. It might even be possible to replace the total scale with one item only, 'my future seems dark to me'.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291701003300

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AISH, A.-M., & WASSERMAN, D.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2001-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
367-372
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2054963708
Cited by
148
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
hopelessness, suicidal behavior, suicide attempters, factor structure, psychometric properties, scale reduction, perceptions of the future
MeSH terms
Affect, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Motivation, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suicide, Attempted, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review