CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 171Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A general population comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)

BRUGHA, T. S., JENKINS, R., TAUB, N., MELTZER, H., BEBBINGTON, P. E.·2001·Psychological Medicine
DOI 10.1017/s0033291701004184
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background. In psychiatric surveys of the general population, there has been considerable discrepancy between diagnoses obtained by fully structured interviews and those established by systematic semi-structured clinical evaluation. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) is an example of the first type of interview widely used in general population surveys. We compared its performance in diagnosing current depressive and anxiety disorders with the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), a semi-structured diagnostic interview administered by clinically trained interviewers. Methods. Household addresses in Leicestershire, UK, were randomly sampled and 860 adults were screened with the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule. Adults with too few symptoms to fulfil diagnostic criteria for study disorders were excluded to increase the proportion re-interviewed who met such criteria. Repeat diagnostic interviews with the CIDI and SCAN, ordered randomly, were sought from eligible screen positive respondents. Recalibrated CIDI prevalence estimates were derived from the SCAN classification using Bayesian statistics. Results. Concordance ranged between ‘poor’ and ‘fair’ across almost all types of study disorders, and for co-morbidity. Concordance was somewhat better for severity of depression and when lower diagnostic thresholds were used for depression. Interview order effects were suggested with lower concordance when CIDI followed SCAN. Recalibration reduced the prevalence of depressive or anxiety disorder from 9·0 to 6·2%. Conclusions. Community psychiatric surveys using structured diagnostic interview data must be interpreted cautiously. They should include an element of clinical re-appraisal so findings can be adjusted for estimation differences between fully structured and clinical assessments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291701004184

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–168 of 168

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
BRUGHA, T. S., JENKINS, R., TAUB, N., MELTZER, H., & BEBBINGTON, P. E.
Affiliations
Office for National Statistics (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2001-07-31
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1001-1013
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
DOI
10.1017/s0033291701004184
OpenAlex
W2148011850
Cited by
171
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
26.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
Composite International Diagnostic Interview, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, psychiatric comorbidity, diagnostic thresholds
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Culture, Depressive Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review