Cited by 171Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being

HUNT, C., ISSAKIDIS, C., ANDREWS, G.·2002·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background This paper reports population data on DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Methods The data were obtained from a nationwide household survey of adults using a stratified multi-stage sampling process. A response rate of 78.1% resulted in 10,641 persons being interviewed. Diagnoses were made using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. The interview was computerized and conducted by trained lay interviewers. Results Prevalence in the total sample was 2.8% for 1-month GAD and 36% for 12-month GAD. Persons over 55 years of age were less likely to have GAD than those in the younger age groups. Logistic regression analysis also showed that a diagnosis of GAD was significantly associated with being of younger to middle age, being separated divorced or widowed, not having tertiary qualifications or being unemployed. Co-morbidity with another affective, anxiety, substance use or personality disorders was common, affecting 68% of the sample with 1-month DSM-IV GAD. GAD was associated with significant disablement, and 57% of the sample with DSM-IV GAD had consulted a health professional for a mental health problem in the prior 12 months. Conclusions The survey provides population data on DSM-IV GAD and its correlates. GAD is a common disorder that is accompanied by significant morbidity and high rates of co-morbidity with affective and anxiety disorders, and is associated with marital status, educa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291702005512

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 171

Authors
HUNT, C., ISSAKIDIS, C., & ANDREWS, G.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2002-05
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
649-659
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2029379930
Cited by
171
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, prevalence, comorbidities, disability, marital status, educational attainment, employment status, mental health service utilization, Australian adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Risk Factors, Sampling Studies, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Comorbidity, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review