The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Twelve-year course and outcome of bulimia nervosa
Abstract
Background. Since little is known about the long-term course and outcome of bulimia nervosa, the authors designed a 12-year prospective longitudinal study with five cross-sectional assessments based on a large sample of consecutively treated females with bulimia nervosa (purging type) (BN-P). Method. One hundred and ninety-six females with BN-P were assessed (1) at the beginning of treatment, (2) at the end of treatment, (3) at 2-year follow-up, (4) at 6-year follow-up, and (5) at 12-year follow-up. In self-ratings as well as expert ratings based on interviews we assessed specific eating-disorder and general psychopathology. Results. The general pattern of results over time showed substantial improvement during treatment, slight (in most cases non-significant) decline during the first two years after the end of treatment, and further improvement and stabilization until 12-year follow-up. At that point the majority of patients (70·1%) showed no major DSM-IV eating disorder, 13·2% had eating disorders not otherwise specified, 10·1% had BN-P and 2% had died. Very few had undergone transition to anorexia nervosa or binge-eating disorders. Logistic regression analyses showed that psychiatric co-morbidity was the best and most stable predictor for eating-disorder outcome at 2, 6 and 12 years. Conclusions. Course and outcome of BN-P was generally more favourable than for anorexia nervosa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arcelus, J., Mitchell, A. J., Wales, J., & Nielsen, S. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74 · Cited by 2,864
Outcomes of eating disorders: a systematic review of the literature
Berkman, N. D., Lohr, K. N., & Bulik, C. M. (2007) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20369 · Cited by 595
Diagnostic Crossover in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa: Implications for DSM-V
Eddy, K. T., Dorer, D. J., Franko, D. L., Tahilani, K., Thompson-Brenner, H., & Herzog, D. B. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060951 · Cited by 535
Recovery from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa at 22-year follow-up
Eddy, K. T., Tabri, N., Thomas, J. J., Murray, H. B., Keshaviah, A., Hastings, E., Edkins, K., Krishna, M., Herzog, D. B., Keel, P. K., et al. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.15m10393 · Cited by 535
The co‐morbidity of eating disorders and anxiety disorders: a review
Swinbourne, J. M., & Touyz, S. W. (2007) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.784 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- FICHTER, M. M., & QUADFLIEG, N.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1395-1406
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2136083191
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twelve-year course and outcome of bulimia nervosa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291704002673
- The paper
- FICHTER, M. M., & QUADFLIEG, N. (2004). Twelve-year course and outcome of bulimia nervosa. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291704002673
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.