The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Population promotion of informal self-help strategies for early intervention against depression and anxiety
Abstract
Much of the burden of depression and anxiety in the population is attributable to subclinical symptoms. Broadening formal health-care systems to treat subclinical depression and anxiety is not the answer to reducing this burden, because health-care systems lack the resources even to provide optimal care to clinical cases. The solution proposed is the population-wide dissemination of informal self-help strategies that have evidence for effectiveness. These are highly acceptable to the public, easily applied, inexpensive and may avert the development of many clinical cases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, online services often include information about mental health literacy [83], providing young people with information about mental illness, where to get help, and what to expect at services.”
From Do online mental health services improve help-seeking for young people? A systematic review (2014) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–104 of 104
A bigger budget for mental health services won’t necessarily improve Australia’s mental health
Jorm, A. F. (2021) · doi:10.64628/aa.yqqadqkt4
Self-citationRodrigues, A. D., Marmeleira, J., Pomar, C., Lamy, E., & Veiga, G. (2026) · Frontiers in Developmental Psychology · doi:10.3389/fdpys.2026.1623171
Journalists’ Experiences of Online Harassment: Anxiety, Depression, and Posttraumatic Stress
Grundy, M. R., Newman, E., & Slaughter, A. (2026) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia7010062
“Therefore, the interventions provided to journalists should be determined by the types and severity of symptoms experienced (Jorm & Griffiths, 2006).”
A Delphi Study to Identify Effective Self-Help and Kindness Strategies for Subthreshold Depression
Hanai, N., Fujieda, S., Hongo, Y., & Asano, K. (2026) · Psychiatry International · doi:10.3390/psychiatryint7030118
Metadata
- Authors
- JORM, A. F., & GRIFFITHS, K. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-22
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-6
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2059739395
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- depression, anxiety, subclinical symptoms, early intervention, prevention, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Depression, Health Promotion, Humans, Self-Help Groups, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
