Gender, victimization, and psychiatric outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Background Although gender differences in rates of internalizing disorders, particularly depression, are well documented, the causes of these differences are not well understood. One influential hypothesis [Cutler & Nolen-Hoeksema, Sex Roles (1991), 24, 425-438] proposes that higher rates of depression in females compared to males may be partially attributable to gender differences in the effects of childhood sexual abuse. The present study has evaluated this possibility by reviewing evidence for gender moderating the effects of childhood victimization on psychiatric outcomes. Method Literature search using PsycINFO and Medline, applying the following inclusion criteria: publication from 1996 to 2006, community-based sampling, adequate male-to-female sample ratio, use of clearly defined psychiatric outcomes, and a statistical test of gender differences in the effects of childhood victimization on psychiatric outcomes. Results Thirty studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, the results were mixed. Nearly half of all studies find no gender differences. In studies that do observe gender differences, victimization tends to be associated with higher psychiatric risk in females in studies with adult samples, whereas in samples of youth, victimization tends to be associated with higher psychiatric risk in males. With respect to outcome, when gender differences were observed, outcomes were distributed across both internalizing and externalizing categories for both genders. Conclusion…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some past studies reported that the effects of childhood maltreatment on victims were different between women and men.
“As some past studies reported that the effects of CM on victims were different between women and men (Gershon et al., 2008), we also examined, in the meta-analyses, whether gender moderated the examined associations.”
From Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Gershon et al., 2008
The effects of a person's CM on their partners were similar for women and men.
“Even if some past studies reported that the effects of CM on victims were different between women and men (Gershon et al., 2008), the effects on their partners were similar for women and men.”
From Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Gershon et al., 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 61 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Gershon, A., Minor, K., & Hayward, C.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hayward, C.
- ORCID
- Gershon, A.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-04-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1377-1391
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- PMC
- PMC3102516
- OpenAlex
- W2125112571
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH076339)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- gender differences, child victimization, child sexual abuse, depression, internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, mental health outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Behavior Disorders, Sex Distribution, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review