Cited by 183Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Voxel-based meta-analysis of regional white-matter volume differences in autism spectrum disorder versus healthy controls

Radua, J., Via, E., Catani, M., Mataix-Cols, D.·2011·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background We conducted a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to clarify the changes in regional white-matter volume underpinning this condition, and generated an online database to facilitate replication and further analyses by other researchers. Method PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Knowledge and Scopus databases were searched between 2002 (the date of the first white-matter VBM study in ASD) and 2010. Manual searches were also conducted. Authors were contacted to obtain additional data. Coordinates were extracted from clusters of significant white-matter difference between patients and controls. A new template for white matter was created for the signed differential mapping (SDM) meta-analytic method. A diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived atlas was used to optimally localize the changes in white-matter volume. Results Thirteen datasets comprising 246 patients with ASD and 237 healthy controls met inclusion criteria. No between-group differences were found in global white-matter volumes. ASD patients showed increases of white-matter volume in the right arcuate fasciculus and also in the left inferior fronto-occipital and uncinate fasciculi. These findings remained unchanged in quartile and jackknife sensitivity analyses and also in subgroup analyses (pediatric versus adult samples). Conclusions Patients with ASD display increases of white-matter volume in tracts known to be important for language and social cognition. W…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291710002187

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 96 · Cited by 183

Authors
Radua, J., Via, E., Catani, M., & Mataix-Cols, D.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2010-11-16
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1539-1550
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2065827336
Cited by
183
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, white matter volume, voxel-based morphometry, arcuate fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus, white matter atlas, diffusion tensor imaging, language and social cognition, neuroanatomical differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Myelin Sheath, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review