Is depression a chronic mental illness?
Open accessAbstract
Over the past few decades, theory and research on depression have increasingly focused on the recurrent and chronic nature of the disorder. These recurrent and chronic forms of depression are extremely important to study, as they may account for the bulk of the burden associated with the disorder. Paradoxically, however, research focusing on depression as a recurrent condition has generally failed to reveal any useful early indicators of risk for recurrence. We suggest that this present impasse is due to the lack of recognition that depression can also be an acute, time-limited condition. We argue that individuals with acute, single lifetime episodes of depression have been systematically eclipsed from the research agenda, thereby effectively preventing the discovery of factors that may predict who, after experiencing a first lifetime episode of depression, goes on to have a recurrent or chronic clinical course. Greater awareness of the high prevalence of people with a single lifetime episode of depression, and the development of research designs that identify these individuals and allow comparisons with those who have recurrent forms of the disorder, could yield substantial gains in understanding the lifetime pathology of this devastating mental illness.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on MDD recurrence is limited by overreliance on cross-sectional methodologies, lack of consensus on what constitutes recurrence, and grouping all individuals with MDD together instead of differentiating subgroups.
“These concerns include overreliance on cross-sectional methodologies, a lack of consensus on what constitutes recurrence, and grouping all individuals with MDD together instead of differentiating subgroups using key characteristics of the disorder (e.g., single verse recurrent episodes) [3, 6–8].”
From Fear of depression recurrence among individuals with remitted depression: a qualitative interview study (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
The paper criticizes cross-sectional recurrence studies and says research has largely overlooked people who have a single lifetime episode and never recur (Abstract; no page provided). It does not say there is a lack of consensus about what constitutes recurrence; the passages address whom studies compare, not how recurrence is defined. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Monroe, S. M., & Harkness, K. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Monroe, S. M.
- Harkness, K. L.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-14
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 899-902
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2002061427
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- depression, chronic depression, recurrent depression, acute depression, research agenda
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Recurrence, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review