Cited by 52Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Gender–age interaction in incidence rates of childhood emotional disorders

Wesselhoeft, R., Pedersen, C. B., Mortensen, P. B., Mors, O., Bilenberg, N.·2015·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background The post-pubertal association of female gender with emotional disorder is a robust finding. However, studies exploring the association of gender and emotional disorders before puberty are few and present diverging results. The aim of this study was to present gender-specific incidence rates of emotional disorders throughout childhood. Method This is a population-based cohort study of 907,806 Danish 3- to 18-year-olds. The outcome was assignment of an emotional disorder diagnosis based on in-patient and out-patient data from The Danish Psychiatric Central Register. Outcome measures were incidence rates and cumulative incidences for unipolar depressive disorder (ICD-10: F32-F33), anxiety disorders (ICD-10: F40-F42), and emotional disorders with onset specific to childhood (ICD-10: F93). Results Pre-pubertal incidence rates for depressive and anxiety disorders were higher for boys than girls. At age 12 years the pattern reversed. The cumulative incidence for any emotional disorder (F32-F33, F40-F42, F93) on the 11th birthday was 0.52% (95% CI 0.50-0.55) for boys and 0.31% (95% CI 0.29-0.33) for girls. On the 19th birthday cumulative incidence was 2.33% (95% CI 2.24-2.43) for boys and 3.77% (95% CI 3.64-3.90) for girls. The pre-pubertal male preponderance was also significant for depressive disorders (F32-F33, p = 0.00144) and anxiety disorders (F40-F42, F93, p Conclusions Emotional disorders seem to display a male preponderance before the age of 12 years and a female…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291714001901

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64 · Cited by 52

Authors
Wesselhoeft, R., Pedersen, C. B., Mortensen, P. B., Mors, O., & Bilenberg, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Wesselhoeft, R.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2014-08-11
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
829-839
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2168331689
Cited by
52
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lundbeckfonden (R155-2014-1724)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
childhood emotional disorders, gender differences, age of onset, puberty, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, incidence rates, cumulative incidence, sex differences in mental disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Age Factors, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Denmark, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Puberty, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review