Intrinsic capacity modifies the risk of depression and anxiety through metabolomic signature
Open accessAbstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) developed an assessment for healthy aging termed intrinsic capacity (IC). However, the association between IC and depression/anxiety remains poorly understood, with limited understanding of the underlying metabolic mechanisms. Methods: This prospective cohort study comprised 212,033 UK Biobank participants recruited between 2006 and 2010. We calculated a UK Biobank-adapted four-domain IC deficit score using seven functional status indicators across psychological, sensory, vitality, and locomotor domains. Elastic net regression was employed to derive a metabolic signature that represented IC status. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for depression and anxiety were computed from associated risk variants. Results: Compared with a 0 IC deficit score, participants with a 4+ score had higher risk, with hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) of 3.96 (3.72–4.21) for depression and 3.03 (2.82–3.25) for anxiety. The metabolic signature of IC comprised 59 metabolites, with mediation effects of 1.007 (1.005, 1.008) for depression and 1.006 (1.004, 1.007) for anxiety. The highest hazards were observed in participants with high PRS and 4+ IC score; the HRs were 4.36 (3.70–5.13) for depression and 3.46 (2.87–4.17) for anxiety. Conclusions: IC is associated with a higher risk of depression and anxiety, possibly mediated by its metabolic signature, with enhanced effects in genetically susceptible individuals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
Ferrari, A. J., Santomauro, D. F., Aali, A., Abate, Y. H., Abbafati, C., Abbastabar, H., Abd ElHafeez, S., Abdelmasseh, M., Abd-Elsalam, S., Abdollahi, A., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00757-8 · Cited by 5,112 · see citing works
Self-citationSánchez-Sánchez, J. L., Lu, W.-H., Gallardo-Gómez, D., del Pozo Cruz, B., de Souto Barreto, P., Lucia, A., & Valenzuela, P. L. (2024) · The Lancet Healthy Longevity · doi:10.1016/s2666-7568(24)00092-8 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Song, S., Suo, X., Guo, J., Li, C., Lu, S., Zhu, Y., Kou, G., & Bo, Y.
- Affiliations
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Kou, Guangning
- Bo, Yacong
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2026
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- e315-e315
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W7220741633
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- intrinsic capacity, healthy aging, depression, anxiety, metabolomic signatures, polygenic risk score, functional status, mediation analysis, genetic susceptibility, UK Biobank
- MeSH terms
- Genetic Risk Score, UK Biobank, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Metabolomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review