Cited by 0Aging, Health, and DisabilityFrailty in Older AdultsHealth disparities and outcomes

Intrinsic capacity modifies the risk of depression and anxiety through metabolomic signature

Open access
Song, Shuaixing, Suo, Xiangying, Guo, Jing, Li, Chunlei, Lu, Shuo, Zhu, Yongjian, Kou, Guangning, Bo, Yacong·2026·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) developed an assessment for healthy aging termed intrinsic capacity (IC). However, the association between IC and depression/anxiety remains poorly understood, with limited understanding of the underlying metabolic mechanisms. Methods: This prospective cohort study comprised 212,033 UK Biobank participants recruited between 2006 and 2010. We calculated a UK Biobank-adapted four-domain IC deficit score using seven functional status indicators across psychological, sensory, vitality, and locomotor domains. Elastic net regression was employed to derive a metabolic signature that represented IC status. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for depression and anxiety were computed from associated risk variants. Results: Compared with a 0 IC deficit score, participants with a 4+ score had higher risk, with hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) of 3.96 (3.72–4.21) for depression and 3.03 (2.82–3.25) for anxiety. The metabolic signature of IC comprised 59 metabolites, with mediation effects of 1.007 (1.005, 1.008) for depression and 1.006 (1.004, 1.007) for anxiety. The highest hazards were observed in participants with high PRS and 4+ IC score; the HRs were 4.36 (3.70–5.13) for depression and 3.46 (2.87–4.17) for anxiety. Conclusions: IC is associated with a higher risk of depression and anxiety, possibly mediated by its metabolic signature, with enhanced effects in genetically susceptible individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291726106047

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Song, S., Suo, X., Guo, J., Li, C., Lu, S., Zhu, Y., Kou, G., & Bo, Y.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Kou, Guangning
  • Bo, Yacong
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2026
Volume
56
Pages
e315-e315
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W7220741633
Cited by
0
References
4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
intrinsic capacity, healthy aging, depression, anxiety, metabolomic signatures, polygenic risk score, functional status, mediation analysis, genetic susceptibility, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Genetic Risk Score, UK Biobank, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review