The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys of Great Britain – strategy and methods
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This paper describes the rationale and methodology of the first national psychiatric morbidity surveys to be carried out in Great Britain. The objectives of the surveys were to estimate the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults aged 16-64 living in Great Britain; to identify the nature and extent of social disabilities associated with psychiatric morbidity; to describe the use of health and social services by people with psychiatric morbidity and to investigate the association between mental illness and potential environmental risk factors in a household sample. METHODS: Four separate surveys were carried out in order to meet the objectives; a private household sample (N = 10108), a sample of institutions caring for the mentally ill (N = 1191), a sample of homeless people (N = 1166), and a supplementary sample of patients with psychosis living in private households (N = 350). A two-stage assessment procedure was used, in which all subjects were given the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) administered by lay interviewers to assess neurotic symptoms and disorders and a psychosis screen, including the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire. Those who were positive on the psychosis screen were then interviewed by psychiatrists using the SCAN (incorporating the tenth edition of the Present State Examination). CONCLUSIONS: Large scale national surveys such as this augment the inadequate data on psychiatric morbidity that are routinely available and are, therefore, an important source of information upon which to base policy and generate aetiological hypotheses. These surveys provide a possible model for similar surveys in other countries.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“16% of people with asthma in the UK have panic disorder,9 compared to 1% in the general population.10”
From A systematic review of psychological, physical health factors, and quality of life in adult asthma (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kessler, R. C., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Wittchen, H. (2012) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1359 · Cited by 2,947
Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe—a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies
Wittchen, H.-U., & Jacobi, F. (2005) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.012 · Cited by 1,503
Bijl, R. V., Ravelli, A., & van Zessen, G. (1998) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050098 · Cited by 1,216
“The figure is much lower than had hitherto been presumed, on the assumption that figures from abroad would be applicable to the Netherlands [ 17 ].”
BackgroundAndrews, G., Henderson, S., & Hall, W. (2001) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.178.2.145 · Cited by 933
Slade, M., & Thornicroft, G. (2025) · doi:10.1093/med/9780198898818.003.0007 · Cited by 679
Metadata
- Authors
- JENKINS, R., BEBBINGTON, P., BRUGHA, T., FARRELL, M., GILL, B., LEWIS, G., MELTZER, H., & PETTICREW, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 765-774
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2140402504
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 21.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Keywords
- psychiatric morbidity, prevalence of mental disorders, social dysfunction, mental health service utilization, environmental risk factors, psychosis, homelessness, psychiatric hospitals, Present State Examination, Great Britain
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, United Kingdom, Health Services, Health Surveys, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Institutionalization, Male, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Sampling Studies, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Databases, Factual, Cost of Illness, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review