The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neurotic disorders and the receipt of psychiatric treatment
Open accessAbstract
Background. Access to psychiatric treatment by people with neurotic disorders in the general population is likely to be affected both by the severity of disorder and by sociodemographic differences. Method. In the household component of the National Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity > 10000 subjects in Great Britain with psychiatric symptoms were interviewed using the CIS-R. They were also asked about difficulties experienced in performing seven types of everyday activity. All subjects classed as having an ICD-10 disorder were questioned about their experience of treatment with antidepressants, hypnotics, and counselling or psychotherapy. Results. Less than 14% of people with current neurotic disorders were receiving treatment for them. Within the previous year, only a third had made contact with their primary care physician for their mental problem: of these < 30% were receiving treatment. Overall, 9% of people with disorders were given medication and 8% counselling or psychotherapy. A diagnosis of depressive episode was that most associated with antidepressant medication. Treatment access was affected by employment status, marital status, and age, but the major determinant was symptom severity. Neither sex nor social class influenced which people received treatment. Conclusions. People with psychiatric disorders seldom receive treatment, even when they have consulted their primary care physician about them. In many cases, this must represent unmet needs with a strong claim on health resources. There are also inequalities in the receipt of treatment, although the major influence is the severity of disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bower, P., & Gilbody, S. (2005) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.186.1.11 · Cited by 1,084
Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial
Christensen, H. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.37945.566632.ee · Cited by 928
Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., & Lépine, J. P. (2004) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00325.x · Cited by 758
Behavioral activation treatments for depression in adults: A meta-analysis and review.
Mazzucchelli, T., Kane, R., & Rees, C. (2009) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01178.x · Cited by 438
Slee, A., Nazareth, I., Bondaronek, P., Liu, Y., Cheng, Z., & Freemantle, N. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31793-8 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- BEBBINGTON, P. E., BRUGHA, T. S., MELTZER, H., JENKINS, R., CERESA, C., FARRELL, M., & LEWIS, G.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1369-1376
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2142465413
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurotic disorders and the receipt of psychiatric treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291799002974
- The paper
- BEBBINGTON, P. E., BRUGHA, T. S., MELTZER, H., JENKINS, R., CERESA, C., FARRELL, M., & LEWIS, G. (2000). Neurotic disorders and the receipt of psychiatric treatment. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291799002974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.