The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Single-particle electron cryo-microscopy: towards atomic resolution
Open accessAbstract
1. Introduction 308 2. Electron microscopy 311 2.1 Specimen preparation 311 2.2 The electron microscope 311 2.3 Acceleration voltage, defocus, and the electron gun 312 2.4 Magnification and data collection 313 3. Digitisation and CTF correction 317 3.1 The patchwork densitometer 318 3.2 Particle selection 320 3.3 Position dependent CTF correction 321 3.4 Precision of CTF determination 321 4. Single particles and angular reconstitution 323 4.1 Preliminary filtering and centring of data 323 4.2 Alignments using correlation functions 324 4.3 Choice of first reference images 324 4.4 Multi-reference alignment of data 325 4.5 MSA eigenvector/eigenvalue data compression 328 4.6 MSA classification 330 4.7 Euler angle determination (‘angular reconstitution’) 332 4.8 Sinograms and sinogram correlation functions 332 4.9 Exploiting symmetry 335 4.10 Three-dimensional reconstruction 337 4.11 Euler angles using anchor sets 339 4.12 Iterative refinements 339 5. Computational hardware/software aspects 341 5.1 The (IMAGIC) image processing workstation 342 5.2 Operating systems and GUIs 342 5.3 Computational logistics 344 5.4 Shared memory machines 344 5.5 Farming on loosely coupled computers 346 5.6 Implementation using MPI protocol 347 5.7 Software is what it's all about 347 6. Interpretation of results 348 6.1 Assessing resolution: the Fourier Shell Correlation 348 6.2 Influence of filtering 351 6.3 Rendering 351 6.4 Searching for known sub-structures 352 6.5 Interpretation 353 7. Examples 353 7.1 Icosahedral symmetry: TBSV at 5·9 Å resolution 354 7.2 The D6 symmetrical worm hemoglobin at 13 Å resolution 356 7.3 Functional states of the 70S E. coli ribosome 357 7.4 The 50S E. coli ribosomal subunit at 7·5 Å resolution 359 8. Perspectives 361 9. Acknowledgements 364 10. References 364 In the past few years, electron microscopy (EM) has established itself as an important – still upcoming – technique for studying the structures of large biological macromolecules. EM is a very direct method of structure determination that complements the well-established techniques of X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. Electron micrographs record images of the object and not just their diffraction patterns and thus the classical ‘phase’ problem of X-ray crystallography does not exist in EM. Modern microscopes may reach resolution levels better than ∼ 1·5 Å, which is more than sufficient to elucidate the polypeptide backbone in proteins directly. X-ray structures at such resolution levels are considered ‘excellent’. The fundamental problem in biological EM is not so much the instrumental resolution of the microscopes, but rather the radiation sensitivity of the biological material one wants to investigate. Information about the specimen is collected in the photographic emulsion with the arrival of individual electrons that have (elastically) interacted with the specimen. However, many electrons will damage the specimen by non-elastic interactions. By the time enough electrons have passed through the object to produce a single good signal-to-noise (SNR) image, the biological sample will have been reduced to ashes. In contrast, stable inorganic specimens in material science often show interpretable details down to the highest possible instrumental resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs
Rohou, A., & Grigorieff, N. (2015) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 · Cited by 4,913
Molecular model for a complete clathrin lattice from electron cryomicroscopy
Fotin, A., Cheng, Y., Sliz, P., Grigorieff, N., Harrison, S. C., Kirchhausen, T., & Walz, T. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03079 · Cited by 541
Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies
Alber, F., Förster, F., Korkin, D., Topf, M., & Sali, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.060407.135530 · Cited by 206
Single-Molecule Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Photosynthetic Systems
Kondo, T., Chen, W. J., & Schlau-Cohen, G. S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00195 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- van Heel, M., Gowen, B., Matadeen, R., Orlova, E. V., Finn, R., Pape, T., Cohen, D., Stark, H., Schmidt, R., Schatz, M., & Patwardhan, A.
- Venue
- Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-369
- ISSN
- 0033-5835 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8994
- OpenAlex
- W2150938882
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single-particle electron cryo-microscopy: towards atomic resolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033583500003644
- The paper
- van Heel, M., Gowen, B., Matadeen, R., Orlova, E. V., Finn, R., Pape, T., Cohen, D., Stark, H., Schmidt, R., Schatz, M., & Patwardhan, A. (2000). Single-particle electron cryo-microscopy: towards atomic resolution. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033583500003644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.