The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Specificity and promiscuity in membrane helix interactions
Abstract
The membrane-spanning portions of many integral membrane proteins consist of one or a number of transmembrane α-helices, which are expected to be independently stable on thermodynamic grounds. Side-by-side interactions between these transmembrane α-helices are important in the folding and assembly of such integral membrane proteins and their complexes. In considering the contribution of these helix–helix interactions to membrane protein folding and oligomerization, a distinction between the energetics and specificity should be recognized. A number of contributions to the energetics of transmembrane helix association within the lipid bilayer will be relatively non-specific, including those resulting from charge–charge interactions and lipid–packing effects. Specificity (and part of the energy) in transmembrane α-helix association, however, appears to rely mainly upon a detailed stereochemical fit between sets of dynamically accessible states of particular helices. In some cases, these interactions are mediated in part by prosthetic groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The packing of α-helices: simple coiled-coils
Crick, F. H. C. (1953) · Acta Crystallographica · doi:10.1107/s0365110x53001964 · Cited by 1,578
Cited by
MEMBRANE PROTEIN FOLDING AND STABILITY: Physical Principles
White, S. H., & Wimley, W. C. (1999) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.319 · Cited by 1,764
Lipid–protein interactions in biological membranes: A structural perspective
Lee, A. G. (2003) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(03)00056-7 · Cited by 886
Agnati, L. F., Ferré, S., Lluis, C., Franco, R., & Fuxe, K. (2003) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.55.3.2 · Cited by 323
A dimerization motif for transmembrane α–helices
Lemmon, M. A., Treutlein, H. R., Adams, P. D., Brünger, A. T., & Engelman, D. M. (1994) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0394-157 · Cited by 314
Self-citationA Rigorous Framework for Calculating Protein–Protein Binding Affinities in Membranes
Blazhynska, M., Gumbart, J. C., Chen, H., Tajkhorshid, E., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00941 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemmon, M. A., & Engelman, D. M.
- Venue
- Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-218
- ISSN
- 0033-5835 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8994
- OpenAlex
- W2110884380
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specificity and promiscuity in membrane helix interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033583500004522
- The paper
- Lemmon, M. A., & Engelman, D. M. (1994). Specificity and promiscuity in membrane helix interactions. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033583500004522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.