The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural studies of protein–nucleic acid interaction: the sources of sequence-specific binding
Abstract
Structural studies of DNA-binding proteins and their complexes with DNA have proceeded at an accelerating pace in recent years due to important technical advances in molecular genetics, DNA synthesis, protein crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance. The last major review on this subject by Pabo & Sauer (1984) summarized the structural and functional studies of the three sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins whose crystal structures were then known, the E. coli catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) (McKay & Steitz, 1981; McKay et al.1982; Weber & Steitz, 1987), a cro repressor from phage λ (Anderson et al.1981), and the DNA-binding proteolytic fragment of λcI repressor protein (Pabo & Lewis, 1982) Although crystallographic studies of the E. coli lac repressor protein were initiated as early as 1971 when it was the only regulatory protein available in sufficient quantities for structural studies (Steitz et al.1974), little was established about the structural aspects of DNA-binding proteins until the structure of CAP was determined in 1980 followed shortly thereafter by the structure of λcro repressor and subsequently that of the λ repressor fragment. There are now determined at high resolution the crystal structures of seven prokaryotic gene regulatory proteins or fragments [CAP,λcro,λcI repressor fragment, 434 repressor fragment (Anderson et al.1987), 434 cro repressor (Wolberger et al.1988),E. coli trp repressor (Schevitz et al.1985),E. coli met repressor (Rafferty et al.1989)],EcoR I restriction endonuclease (McClarin et al.1986), DNAse I (Suck & Ofner, 1986), the catalytic domain of γδ resolvase (Hatfull et al.1989) and two sequence-independent double-stranded DNA-binding proteins [the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I (Ollis et al.1985) and the E. coli Hu protein (Tanaka et al., 1984)].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Leucine Zipper: A Hypothetical Structure Common to a New Class of DNA Binding Proteins
Landschulz, W. H., Johnson, P. F., & McKnight, S. L. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3289117 · Cited by 3,443
Cited by
Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex
Kim, Y., Geiger, J. H., Hahn, S., & Sigler, P. B. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365512a0 · Cited by 1,084
Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element
Kim, J. L., Nikolov, D. B., & Burley, S. K. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365520a0 · Cited by 1,048
Raines, R. T. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960427h · Cited by 937
Sequence‐Specific Recognition and Modification of Double‐Helical DNA by Oligonucleotides
Thuong, N. T., & Hélène, C. (1993) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English · doi:10.1002/anie.199306661 · Cited by 623
A novel gysteine-rich sequence motif
Freemont, P. S., Hanson, I. M., & Trowsdale, J. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90229-r · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Steitz, T. A.
- Venue
- Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 205-280
- ISSN
- 0033-5835 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8994
- OpenAlex
- W2123242549
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural studies of protein–nucleic acid interaction: the sources of sequence-specific binding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033583500005552
- The paper
- Steitz, T. A. (1990). Structural studies of protein–nucleic acid interaction: the sources of sequence-specific binding. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033583500005552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.