Cited by 35Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchGeological and Geochemical Analysis

AMS Dating of a Late Quaternary Tephra at Graham's Terrace, New Zealand

Open access
Gillespie, Richard, Hammond, A. P., Goh, K. M., Tonkin, P. J., Lowe, D. C., Sparks, R. J., Wallace, Gavin·1992·Radiocarbon

Abstract

The radiocarbon dating of volcanic ash (tephra) deposits in New Zealand has been difficult on sites remote from the eruption, which contain either little carbon or degraded and contaminated charcoal. Although many studies of contamination removal from macroscopic charcoals from tephra sequences have been made, little attention has been paid to those containing no visible charcoal, because of the difficulty of obtaining sufficient carbon for radiometric dating. We report here experiments using accelerator mass spectrometry to establish a reliable method for dating a low-carbon aeolian and peat deposit containing a tephra horizon. Results so far demonstrate that improvements to existing chemical pretreatment methods are possible, and that dates obtained on oxidized fine-grained residues can approach the maximum age determined on good quality charred wood samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200013382

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bailey, J. M. and Lee, R. 1972 The effect of alkaline pretreatment on the radiocarbon dates of several New Zealand charcoals. In Grant-Taylor, T. L. and Rafter, T. A., eds., Proceedings of the 8th International "C Conference. Wellington, The Royal Society of New Zealand: 046-55.
  2. Campbell, I. B. 1986 New occurrences and distribution of Kawakawa Tephra in South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 29: 425-435.
  3. Gillespie, R. 1990 On the use of oxidation in AMS sample pretreatment. In Yiou, F. and Raisbeck, G. M., eds., Proceedings of the 5th International Confer- ence on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B52: 345-347.
  4. Goh, K. M. 1978 Removal of contaminants to improve the reliability of radiocarbon dates of peat. Journal of Soil Science 29(3): 340-349. 1991 Carbon dating. In Coleman, D. C. and Fry, B., eds., Carbon Isotope Techniques. San Diego, Academic Press, Inc.: 125-145.
  5. Goh, K. M. and Molloy, B. J. P. 1972 Reliability of radiocarbon dates from buried charcoals. In Grant- Taylor, T. L. and Rafter, T. A. eds., Proceedings of the 8th International Radiocarbon Conference. Wellington, The Royal Society of New Zealand: G29-45.
  6. Hammond, A. P., Goh, K. M., Tonkin, P. J. and Man- ning, M. R. 1991 Chemical pretreatments for improv- ing the radiocarbon dates of peats and organic silts in a gley podzol environment, Graham's Terrace, North Westland. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 34: 191-194.
  7. Mew, G., Hunt, J. L., Froggart, P. C., Eden, D. N. and Jackson, R. J. 1986 An occurrence of Kawakawa Tephra from the Grey Valley, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology & Geo- physics 29: 315-322.
  8. Scharpenseel, H. W. 1979 Soil fraction dating. In Berger, R. and Suess, H. E., eds, Radiocarbon Dating. Proceedings of the 9th International 14C Conference. Berkeley, University of California Press: 279-284.
  9. Shultz, H. (ms.) 1962 Studies in Radiocarbon Dating. Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania: 57.
  10. Singh, G., and Geissler, E. A. 1985 Late Cainozoic history of vegetation, fire, lake levels and climate at Lake George, New South Wales, Australia. Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B311: 379-447.
  11. Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. A. 1977 Discussion: Report- ing of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3): 355-363.
  12. Wilson, C. J. N., Switsur, V. R. and Ward, A. P. 1988 A new 14C age for the Oruanui (Wairakei) eruption, New Zealand. Geological Magazine 125: 297-300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200013382 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gillespie, R., Hammond, A. P., Goh, K. M., Tonkin, P. J., Lowe, D. C., Sparks, R. J., & Wallace, G.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
1992
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
21-27
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W2496900826
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
Late Quaternary, New Zealand, chemical pretreatment, sample contamination, peat deposits, aeolian deposits, AMS radiocarbon dating, volcanic ash

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review