Alternative Explanations for Anomalous 14C Ages on Human Skeletons Associated with the 612 BCE Destruction of Nineveh
Open accessAbstract
Three factors—contamination, a dietary reservoir effect, and a regional δ 14 C anomaly—are considered as possible contributing explanations for an almost 2-century offset between the historically documented age of 612 BCE and the calibrated ages of 9 14 C determinations obtained on 3 human skeletons directly associated stratigraphically with an archaeologically—and historically—defined 612 BCE event at the ancient site of Nineveh in northern Mesopotamia (Iraq). We note that on the order of a 1% (∼80 yr) offset caused by one or a combination of these 3 factors, or other as yet unidentified additional factor(s), would be sufficient to move the average measured 14 C age of these bone samples within the major “warp” in the 14 C timescale during the mid-1st millennium BCE. We provide what we believe to be sufficient evidence that contamination is not a major factor in the case of these bone samples. At this time, we lack appropriate data to determine with sufficient rigor the degree to which a dietary reservoir effect may be contributing to the offset. At present, a posited regional δ 14 C anomaly does not appear to be supported on the basis of data from several other localities in the Near East of similar age. One purpose of presenting this data set is to solicit comparisons with 14 C values obtained on samples from additional, historically well-documented, known-age archaeological contexts for this time period in this and adjacent regions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Calibration introduced a two-century error into the radiocarbon dating of bones from the collapse of a city gate during the destruction of Nineveh, historically dated to 612 BCE.
“Perhaps most telling is the two-century error introduced by calibration into the radiocarbon dating of the bones of those killed in the collapse of a city gate during the destruction of Nineveh, historically determined to be in 612 .”
From Shishak and Shoshenq: A Disambiguation (2021) · cites this paper as Taylor et al . 2010
The ‘Apparent Anomaly and Alternative Explanations’ section (page unavailable) says the calibrated mean age of nine Halzi Gate bone measurements is a little less than two centuries older than the assumed death date of 612 BCE. It does not say calibration introduced the error; it considers other possible causes for the offset. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Bronk Ramsey C, Higham T, Bowles A, Hedges R. 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1):155-63.
- Brown TA, Nelson DE, Vogel JS, Southon JR. 1988. Im- proved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30(2):171-7.
- Brown SC. 1999. The collapse of the Neo-Assyrian Em- pire. Bulletin of the Canadian Society for Mesopota- mian Studies 34:69-75.
- Bury JB, Cook SA, Adcock FE, editors. 1954. The As- syrian Empire. In: Cambridge Ancient History. Vol- ume 3 (1925, reprinted with corrections 1954). Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cook GT, Bonsall C, Hedges REM, McSweeney K, Bo- roneanþ V, Bartosiewicz L, Pettitt PB. 2002. Problems of dating human bones from the Iron Gates. Antiquity 76(291):77-85.
- Gadd CJ. 1923. The Fall of Nineveh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Grayson AK. 1975. Assyrian and Babylonian Chroni- cles. Locust Valley, New York: J J Augustin. Hedges REM, Clement JG, Thomas CDL, O'Connell TC. 2007. Collagen turnover in the adult femoral mid- shaft: modeled from anthropogenic radiocarbon tracer measurements. American Journal of Physical Anthro- pology 133(2):808-16.
- Reimer PJ, Baillie MGL, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Bertrand CJH, Blackwell PG, Buck CE, Burr GS, Cut- ler KB, Damon PE, Edwards RL, Fairbanks RG, Friedrich M, Guilderson TP, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kromer B, McCormac G, Manning S, Bronk Ramsey C, Reimer RW, Remmele S, Southon JR, Stuiver M, Talamo S, Taylor FW, van der Plicht J, Weyhenmeyer CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibra- tion, 0-26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029-58.
- Southon J, Santos G, Druffel-Rodriguez K, Druffel E, Trumbore S, Xu X, Griffin S, Ali S, Mazon M. 2004. The Keck Carbon cycle AMS Laboratory, University of California, Irvine: initial operation and a back- ground surprise. Radiocarbon 46(1):41-9.
- Stronach D. 1997. Notes on the Fall of Nineveh. In: Par- pola S, Whiting RM, editors. Assyria 1995. Proceed- ings of the 10th Anniversary Symposium of Neo-As- syrian Text Corpus Project. Helsinki, 7-11 September 1995, Helsinki. p 307-24.
- Stuiver M, Polach HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14 C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355-63.
- Stuiver M, Reimer PJ. 1993. Extended 14 C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14 C age calibration program. Ra- diocarbon 35(1):215-30.
- Taylor RE. 1987. Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeologi- cal Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
- Taylor RE. 1992. Radiocarbon dating of bone: beyond collagen. In: Taylor RE, Long A, Kra R, editors. Ra- diocarbon After Four Decades: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag. p 375-402.
- Taylor RE, Stuiver M, Reimer PJ. 1996. Development and extension of the calibration of the radiocarbon time scale: archaeological applications. Quaternary Science Reviews 15(7):655-68.
- Wild EM, Arlamovsky KA, Golser R, Kutschera W, Priller A, Puchegger S, Rom W, Steler P, Vycudilik W. 2000. 14 C dating with the bomb peak: an application to forensic medicine. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1-4):944-50.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fahrni, S. M., Southon, J., Fuller, B. T., Park, J., Friedrich, M., Muscheler, R., Wacker, L., & Taylor, R. E. (2020) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2020.16 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationShishak and Shoshenq: A Disambiguation
Wallenfels, R. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.139.2.0487 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taylor, R. E., Beaumont, W. C., Southon, J., Stronach, D., & Pickworth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, R E
- ORCID
- Southon, John
- Venue
- Radiocarbon
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 372-382
- ISSN
- 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-5755
- OpenAlex
- W1934677417
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
- Keywords
- Nineveh, skeletal remains, contamination, radiocarbon calibration, 1st millennium BC, Near East, historical chronology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review