Cited by 1Indian and Buddhist StudiesEurasian Exchange NetworksClassical Studies and Philology

XXII. Documents Sanscrits de la Seconde Collection M. A. Stein

de la Vallee Poussin, L.·1911·Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society

Abstract

Je suis très reconnaissant au Dr. M. A. Stein de m'avoir confié l'étude de la plupart des documents sanscrits qu'il a découverts au cours de sa seconde expédition en Asie Centrale, au prix de quels labeurs, et grâce à quelle ingéniosité prudente et hardie, il nous a permis, avec autant d'humour que de modestie, de le deviner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0035869x00041927

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A second fragmentary Central Asian manuscript, found by M. Aurel Stein at Khadaliq and published by L. de La Vallée Poussin (1911, pp. 770-772), contains another example of a text evidently modeled on Aśvaghoṣa's BC.

    “A second fragmentary Central Asian manuscript, found by M. Aurel Stein at Khadaliq (near Khotan) and published by L. de La Valle ´e Poussin (1911, pp. 770-772), contains another example of a text which is evidently modeled on As ´vaghos ˙ a's BC.”

    From The Sincerest Form of Flattery: On Imitations of Aśvaghoṣa’s Mahākāvyas (2019) · cites this paper as La Vallée Poussin (1911, pp. 770-772)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de la Vallee Poussin, L.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society
Published
1911-07
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
759-777
ISSN
  • 1356-1863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0591
OpenAlex
W4240358898
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Eurasian Exchange Networks
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
Central Asia, Sanskrit manuscripts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review