Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 169Social Policies and FamilyGender and Feminist StudiesGender Politics and Representation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pronatalism, Gender Politics, and the Renewal of Family Support in Russia: Toward a Feminist Anthropology of “Maternity Capital”

Rivkin-Fish, Michele·2010·Slavic Review
DOI 10.1017/s0037677900012201
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines the gendered consequences of linking family support to state pronatalist goals in contemporary Russia. By analyzing the policies, proposals, and critiques circulating on the maternity capital program, Michele Rivkin-Fish demonstrates how state power and citizenship are being constructed through struggles over the meanings of gender and family. She further argues that studies of Russian demographic politics must bring attention to both institutional transformations and the symbolic levels of discourse. This holistic approach, rooted in feminist anthropology, illuminates the particular, cultural logics informing demographic debates as well as the apparent contradictions between ideologies, policies, and practices. Pronatalist discourses engage Russian politicians, experts, and laypersons in efforts to undo the troubling legacy of Soviet gender relations and the 1990s fertility crisis; in the process, these policies define and deploy state power in ways that sustain and normalize gender inequalities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0037677900012201

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ovcharova, 2007, Naselenie Rossii 2005: Trinadtsatyi ezhegodnyi demograficheskii doklad, 126
  2. Sinel'nikov, 1988, Planirovanie sent'i i natsional'nye traditsii, 47
  3. Antonov, 1986, Vtoroi rebenok, 89
  4. Field, 2007, Private Life and Communist Morality in KJirushchev's Russia
  5. Zdravomyslova, 2003, Gosudarstvennoe konstruirovanie gendera v sovetskom obshchestve, Zhurnnl issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki], 3/4, 306
  6. Borisov, 1976, Perspektivy rozhdaemosti, 13
  7. Antonov, 1995, Sem'ia naporoge tret'ego tysiacheletiia, 182
  8. Antonov, 1982, Sem'ia i deti
  9. Khorev, 1997, V chem ostrota demograficheskoi problemy v Rossii?, Rossiia i mir (Informalsionnyi ekspress biulleten' dlia deputatov Gosudarstvennoi Dumy), 135, 1
  10. Putin, 2000, Kakuiu Rossiiu my stroim, Rossiiskaia gazeta,, 11, 1
  11. David, From Abortion to Contraception,, 234
  12. Nikolaev, 2005, Schast'e materi—schast'e Rossii, Meditsinskii vestnik,, 23, 1
  13. Piskunov, 1974, Demograficheskaia politika, 24
  14. Solomon, 1992, The Demographic Argument in Soviet Debates over the Legalization of Abortion in die 1920s, Cahiers du Monde russe el sovietique?>2>,, 1, 12
  15. Elizarov, 2007, Kontseptsiia uvolena, da zdravstvuet KONTSEPTSIIA!, Demoscope Weekly,, 12
  16. Jones, 1987, Modernization, Value Change and Fertility in the Soviet. Union, 275
  17. Lovtsova, 2003, 'Zdorovaia, blagopoluchnaia sem'ia—opora gosudarstva'? Gendernyi analiz semeinoi sotsial'noi politiki, Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki, 1, 323
  18. Medvedeva, 2000, Sud'ba sem'i v Rossii XXI veka: Razmyshleniia o semeinoi politike, o vozmozhnosti protivodeistuiia upadku sem'i i depopuliatsii
  19. Medvedeva, 2000, Demograficheskaia voina protiv Rossii, Nash sovremennik,, 1
  20. Zhurzhenko, 2008, Gendernyerynki Ukrainy: Politicheskaia ekonomiia natsional'nogo stroitel'stva, 119
  21. Zakharov, 2006, Demograficheskii analiz effekta mer semeinoi politiki v Rossii v 1980kh g., SPERO: Sotsial'naiapolitika: Ekspertiza, rekomendatsii, obzory,, 33
  22. Chernova, 2008, Semeinaia politika v Evrope i Rossii: Gendernyi analiz, 209, 215
  23. Antonov, 1980, Sotsiologiia rozhdaemosti
  24. Zdravomyslova, 2009, Gosudarstvennoe konstruirovanie gendera v sovetskom obshchestve Vymiraiushchiy vid, Correspondent, 3

Cited by

See all 169

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rivkin-Fish, M.
Venue
Slavic Review
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2010
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
701-724
ISSN
  • 0037-6779 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-7784
DOI
10.1017/s0037677900012201
OpenAlex
W2587194729
Cited by
164
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 2583 d)
Locations
Slavic Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
Keywords
maternal capital, pronatalism, family support policy, gender politics, population policy, gender inequality, post-Soviet Russia, feminist anthropology, family discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pronatalism, Gender Politics, and the Renewal of Family Support in Russia: Toward a Feminist Anthropology of “Maternity Capital”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0037677900012201
The paper
Rivkin-Fish, M. (2010). Pronatalism, Gender Politics, and the Renewal of Family Support in Russia: Toward a Feminist Anthropology of “Maternity Capital”. Slavic Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0037677900012201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.