The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century
Abstract
The authors present an alternative to power resource theory as an approach to the study of distribution and redistribution. While they agree that partisanship and union power are important, they argue that both are endogenous to more fundamental differences in the organization of capitalist democracies. specifically, center-left governments result from pr consensus political systems (as opposed to majoritarian systems), while strong unions have their origins in coordinated (as opposed to liberal) capitalism. These differences in political representation and in the organization of production developed jointly in the early twentieth century and explain the cross-national pattern of distribution and redistribution. The clusters have their origins in two distinct political economic conditions in the second half of the nineteenth century: one in which locally coordinated economies were coupled with strong guild traditions and heavy investment in cospecific assets and one in which market-based economies were coupled with liberal states and more mobile assets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,594
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage
Porter, P. K., Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2003) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/30040740 · Cited by 7,510
Self-citationA Rational Theory of the Size of Government
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261013 · Cited by 5,485
The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity
Becker, W. H., Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1987) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1904160 · Cited by 4,315
Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective.
Nove, A., & Gerschenkron, A. (1963) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2601558 · Cited by 4,183
Diebold, W., Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1985) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20042386 · Cited by 3,266
Still the Century of Corporatism?
Schmitter, P. C. (1974) · The Review of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0034670500022178 · Cited by 2,637
Thelen, K. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790997 · Cited by 2,477
The Theory of Political Coalitions
Brazil, B. R., & Riker, W. S. (1963) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/445870 · Cited by 2,106
Cited by
Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations are Changing, and Reshaping the World
Inglehart, R. F. (2020) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soz119 · Cited by 284
The Autocratic Welfare State: Old-Age Pensions, Credible Commitments, and Regime Survival
Knutsen, C. H., & Rasmussen, M. (2018) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414017710265 · Cited by 146
Understanding the Determinants of Penal Policy: Crime, Culture, and Comparative Political Economy
Lacey, N., Soskice, D., & Hope, D. (2018) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091942 · Cited by 93
Self-citationLegislative response to international terrorism
Epifanio, M. (2011) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343311399130 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Iversen, T., & Soskice, D.
- Venue
- World Politics
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2009-05-21
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-486
- ISSN
- 0043-8871 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3338
- OpenAlex
- W2136131592
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 97.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s004388710900015x
- The paper
- Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2009). Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century. World Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004388710900015x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
