The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Public Participation and Collaborative Governance
Open accessAbstract
This paper draws on the findings of a study within the ESRC's Democracy and Participation Programme. It explores the processes of participation within deliberative forums – such as user panels, youth forums, area based committees – developed as a means of encouraging a more active, participating mode of citizenship and of improving welfare services by making them more responsive to users. Our findings open up a number of issues about constraints on the development of ‘collaborative governance’. To understand these constraints, we suggest, there is need to locate participation initiatives in the context of government policy, to explore ways in which such policy is interpreted and enacted by strategic actors in local organisations and to examine the perceptions of members of deliberative forums themselves. Our findings highlight the constraints on the ‘political opportunity structures’ created by the enhanced policy focus on public participation, and the consequent limits to ‘collaborative governance’. We discuss how governance theory and social movement theory can each contribute to the analysis, but also suggest productive points of engagement through which each of these bodies of theory might enrich the other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Democratic innovations: designing institutions for citizen participation
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5275 · Cited by 915
Governance principles for natural resource management
Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920802178214 · Cited by 630
O’Mara-Eves, A., Brunton, G., McDaid, D., Oliver, S., Kavanagh, J., Jamal, F., Matosevic, T., Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2013) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr01040 · Cited by 438
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review
Mitton, C., Smith, N., Peacock, S., Evoy, B., & Abelson, J. (2009) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.01.005 · Cited by 396
Introduction: Embedding participatory governance
Bussu, S., Bua, A., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2022) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- NEWMAN, J., BARNES, M., SULLIVAN, H., & KNOPS, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Policy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-03-29
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-223
- ISSN
- 0047-2794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7823
- OpenAlex
- W2146063153
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public Participation and Collaborative Governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0047279403007499
- The paper
- NEWMAN, J., BARNES, M., SULLIVAN, H., & KNOPS, A. (2004). Public Participation and Collaborative Governance. Journal of Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279403007499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.