Cited by 72Social Policy and Reform StudiesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchHealthcare innovation and challenges

Choice and Values: Individualised Rational Action and Social Goals

TAYLOR-GOOBY, PETER·2008·Journal of Social Policy

Abstract

For excellent reasons, in response to pressures from social, economic and political changes, welfare states are undergoing reform. A central theme in the new policies, particularly influential in the UK, is the use of incentives through activation programmes and reforms to public sector management to promote rational responsible choices by both service users and providers. The theoretical underpinning of this approach relies on a model of people as plural in their values, but holding values that are independent from social context and institutional framework. Policy seeks to harness those values to produce desired behaviour. This article focuses on two relevant literatures. Analyses of rational action at an individual level by economic psychologists, evolutionary biologists and game theorists indicate that the context in which choices are framed influences responses. Further work by economic sociologists and social psychologists suggests that the values that guide behaviour have an important social element as normative systems embodied in institutional frameworks. The norms appropriate to market interactions typically differ from welfare norms, so that different value frameworks and responses apply. The implication is that the transition to quasi-market and individualised incentive systems risks damaging the norms that sanction support for distant but vulnerable groups. The article falls into three sections: reviewing the background to reform and the emergence of an emphasis…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0047279407001699

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TAYLOR-GOOBY, P.
Venue
Journal of Social Policy
Published
2008-04
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
167-185
ISSN
  • 0047-2794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7823
OpenAlex
W2098461382
Cited by
72
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
76.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Social Policy (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Healthcare innovation and challenges
Keywords
welfare state reform, activation programs, incentive policies, choice framing, social norms, public sector management, economic psychology, evolutionary biology, game theory, economic sociology, social psychology, vulnerable populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review